The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attainable Gravimetric and Volumetric Energy Density of Li–S and Li Ion Battery Cells with Solid Separator-Protected Li Metal Anodes
Abstract
As a result of sulfur's high electrochemical capacity (1675 mA h/gs), lithium-sulfur batteries have received significant attention as a potential high-specific-energy alternative to current state-of-the-art rechargeable Li ion batteries. For Li-S batteries to compete with commercially available Li ion batteries, high-capacity anodes, such as those that use Li metal, will need to be enabled to fully exploit sulfur's high capacity. The development of Li metal anodes has focused on eliminating Coulombically inefficient and dendritic Li cycling, and to this end, an interesting direction of research is to protect Li metal by employing mechanically stiff solid-state Li(+) conductors, such as garnet phase Li7La3Zr2O12 (LLZO), NASICON-type Li1+xAlxTi2-x(PO4)3 (LATP), and Li2S-P2S5 glasses (LPS), as electrode separators. Basic calculations are used to quantify useful targets for solid Li metal protective separator thickness and cost to enable Li metal batteries in general and Li-S batteries specifically. Furthermore, maximum electrolyte-to-sulfur ratios that allow Li-S batteries to compete with Li ion batteries are calculated. The results presented here suggest that controlling the complex polysulfide speciation chemistry in Li-S cells with realistic, minimal electrolyte loading presents a meaningful opportunity to develop Li-S batteries that are competitive on a specific energy basis with current state-of-the-art Li ion batteries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Cited by
Promising Routes to a High Li+ Transference Number Electrolyte for Lithium Ion Batteries
Diederichsen, K. M., McShane, E. J., & McCloskey, B. D. (2017) · ACS Energy Letters · doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00792 · Cited by 874
Self-citationSendek, A. D., Yang, Q., Cubuk, E. D., Duerloo, K.-A. N., Cui, Y., & Reed, E. J. (2017) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c6ee02697d · Cited by 448
Stabilizing the Interface of NASICON Solid Electrolyte against Li Metal with Atomic Layer Deposition
Liu, Y., Sun, Q., Zhao, Y., Wang, B., Kaghazchi, P., Adair, K. R., Li, R., Zhang, C., Liu, J., Kuo, L.-Y., et al. (2018) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.8b06366 · Cited by 312
How Far Away Are Lithium-Sulfur Batteries From Commercialization?
Zhu, K., Wang, C., Chi, Z., Ke, F., Yang, Y., Wang, A., Wang, W., & Miao, L. (2019) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2019.00123 · Cited by 181
Lithium-Sulfur Battery Technology Readiness and Applications—A Review
Fotouhi, A., Auger, D., O’Neill, L., Cleaver, T., & Walus, S. (2017) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en10121937 · Cited by 180
Metadata
- Authors
- McCloskey, B. D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-11-06
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 4581-4588
- ISSN
- 1948-7185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2425438201
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attainable Gravimetric and Volumetric Energy Density of Li–S and Li Ion Battery Cells with Solid Separator-Protected Li Metal Anodes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01814
- The paper
- McCloskey, B. D. (2015). Attainable Gravimetric and Volumetric Energy Density of Li–S and Li Ion Battery Cells with Solid Separator-Protected Li Metal Anodes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01814
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.