Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 27

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparing the Use of Magnetic Beads with Ultrafiltration for Ancient Dental Calculus Proteomics

Palmer, Karren S., Makarewicz, Cheryl A., Tishkin, Alexey A., Tur, Svetlana S., Chunag, Amartuvshin, Diimajav, Erdenebaatar, Jamsranjav, Bayarsaikhan, Buckley, Michael·2021·Journal of Proteome Research

Abstract

Over the past two decades, proteomic analysis has greatly developed in application to the field of biomolecular archaeology, coinciding with advancements in LC-MS/MS instrumentation sensitivity and improvements in sample preparation methods. Recently, human dental calculus has received much attention for its well-preserved proteomes locked in mineralized dental plaque which stores information on human diets and the oral microbiome otherwise invisible to other biomolecular approaches. Maximizing proteome recovery in ancient dental calculus, available only in minute quantities and irreplaceable after destructive analysis, is of paramount importance. Here, we compare the more traditional ultrafiltration-based and acetone precipitation approaches with the newer paramagnetic bead approach in order to test the influence of demineralization acid on recovered proteome complexity obtained from specimens as well as the sequence coverages matched for significant proteins. We found that a protocol utilizing EDTA combined with paramagnetic beads increased proteome complexity, in some cases doubling the number of unique peptides and number of proteins matched, compared to protocols involving the use of HCl and either acetone precipitation or ultrafiltration. Although the increase in the number of proteins was almost exclusively of bacterial origin, a development that has implications for the study of diseases within these ancient populations, an increase in the peptide number for the dairy proteins β-lactoglobulin and casein was also observed reflecting an increase in sequence coverage for these dietary proteins of interest. We also consider structural explanations for the discrepancies observed between these two key dietary proteins preserved in archaeological dental calculus.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00862

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 65 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. De La Fuente C., 2012, Archaeometry, 55, 766
  2. Sawyer L., 2013, In Advanced Dairy Chemistry, 1, 319
  3. Farrell H. M., 2002, In Methods in Molecular Biology. calcium Binding Protein Protocols, 172
  4. Linderström-Lang K., 1929, Compt. Rend. Trav. Lab. Carlsberg. Ser. Chim., 17, 1

Cited by

See all 27

Metadata

Authors
Palmer, K. S., Makarewicz, C. A., Tishkin, A. A., Tur, S. S., Chunag, A., Diimajav, E., Jamsranjav, B., & Buckley, M.
Affiliations
  • School of Natural Sciences, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, United Kingdom
  • Institute for Prehistoric and Protohistoric Archaeology, Kiel University, Johanna-Mestorf Strasse 2-6, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
  • Department of Archeology, Ethnography, and Museology, Altai State University, Lenin Prospect 61, 656049 Barnaul, Russia
  • Mongolian Institute of Archaeology, Ulaanbaatar 13343, Mongolia
  • Department of Archaeology and History, Ulaanbataar State University, Luvsantseveen Street, 5th khoroo, 15th khorgoolol, Bayanzurk District 13343 Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • National Museum of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar Mongolia, Juulchin Street-1, Ulaanbaatar 13343, Mongolia
Venue
Journal of Proteome Research
Published
2021-02-17
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
1689-1704
ISSN
  • 1535-3893
  • 1535-3907
Cited by
27
References
65
Language
en
Funders
  • Royal Society (UF120473)
  • H2020 European Research Council (772957)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparing the Use of Magnetic Beads with Ultrafiltration for Ancient Dental Calculus Proteomics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00862
The paper
Palmer, K. S., Makarewicz, C. A., Tishkin, A. A., Tur, S. S., Chunag, A., Diimajav, E., Jamsranjav, B., & Buckley, M. (2021). Comparing the Use of Magnetic Beads with Ultrafiltration for Ancient Dental Calculus Proteomics. Journal of Proteome Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00862

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.