Cited by 179Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryCharacterization and Applications of Magnetic NanoparticlesUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications

Magnetic drug targeting: preclinical in vivo studies, mathematical modeling, and extrapolation to humans

Open access
Al-Jamal, Khuloud T., Bai, Jie, Wang, Julie Tzu-Wen, Protti, Andrea, Southern, Paul, Bogart, Lara, Heidari, Hamed, Li, Xinjia +7 more·2016·Nano Letters

Abstract

A sound theoretical rationale for the design of a magnetic nanocarrier capable of magnetic capture in vivo after intravenous administration could help elucidate the parameters necessary for in vivo magnetic tumor targeting. In this work, we utilized our long-circulating polymeric magnetic nanocarriers, encapsulating increasing amounts of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) in a biocompatible oil carrier, to study the effects of SPION loading and of applied magnetic field strength on magnetic tumor targeting in CT26 tumor-bearing mice. Under controlled conditions, the in vivo magnetic targeting was quantified and found to be directly proportional to SPION loading and magnetic field strength. Highest SPION loading, however, resulted in a reduced blood circulation time and a plateauing of the magnetic targeting. Mathematical modeling was undertaken to compute the in vivo magnetic, viscoelastic, convective, and diffusive forces acting on the nanocapsules (NCs) in accordance with the Nacev-Shapiro construct, and this was then used to extrapolate to the expected behavior in humans. The model predicted that in the latter case, the NCs and magnetic forces applied here would have been sufficient to achieve successful targeting in humans. Lastly, an in vivo murine tumor growth delay study was performed using docetaxel (DTX)-encapsulated NCs. Magnetic targeting was found to offer enhanced therapeutic efficacy and improve mice survival compared to passive targeting at drug doses of ca. 5-8 mg of DTX/kg. This is, to our knowledge, the first study that truly bridges the gap between preclinical experiments and clinical translation in the field of magnetic drug targeting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02261

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Al-Jamal et al. concluded that their magnetic drug targeting approach would be feasible in humans if particles of the right size and SPION content can be employed.

    “They concluded that their magnetic drug targeting approach would be feasible in human, if particles of the right size and the right SPION content can be employed.”
  • Magnetic targeting in CT26 tumor-bearing mice was directly proportional to SPION loading and magnetic field strength.

    “The in vivo results showed that magnetic targeting in CT26 tumor bearing mice was directly proportional to SPION loading and magnetic field strength.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Pankhurst, Q. A.; Connolly, J.; Jones, S.; Dobson, J. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2003, 36, R167.
  2. Scialabba, C.; Licciardi, M.; Mauro, N.; Rocco, F.; Ceruti, M.; Giammona, G. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2014, 88, 695-705.
  3. Williams, P. S.; Carpino, F.; Zborowski, M. Mol. Pharmaceutics 2009, 6, 1290-1306.
  4. Grief, A. D.; Richardson, G. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2005, 293, 455-463.
  5. Goya, G.; Grazu, V.; Ibarra, M. Curr. Nanosci. 2008, 4, 1-16.
  6. Cherry, E. M.; Maxim, P. G.; Eaton, J. K. Med. Phys. 2010, 37, 175.
  7. Voltairas, P.; Fotiadis, D.; Michalis, L. J. Biomech. 2002, 35, 813- 821.
  8. Chertok, B.; David, A. E.; Huang, Y.; Yang, V. C. J. Controlled Release 2007, 122, 315-323.
  9. Babincova, M.; Babinec, P. Biomed. Pap. 2009, 153, 243-250.
  10. Chertok, B.; David, A. E.; Yang, V. C. J. Controlled Release 2011, 155, 393-399.
  11. Cole, A. J.; David, A. E.; Wang, J.; Galbań, C. J.; Yang, V. C. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 6291-6301.
  12. Bai, J.; Wang, J. T. W.; Rubio, N.; Protti, A.; Heidari, H.; El- Gogary, R. I.; Southern, P.; Al-Jamal, W. T.; Sosabowski, J.; Shah, A.; Bals, S.; Pankhurst, Q. A.; Al-Jamal, K. T. Theranostics 2016, 6, 342- 356.
  13. El-Gogary, R. I.; Rubio Carrero, N.; Wang, J. T.-W.; Al-Jamal, W. T.; Bourgognon, M.; Kafa, H.; Naeem, M.; Klippstein, R.; Abbate, V.; Leroux, F.; et al. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 1384-1401.
  14. Klippstein, R.; Wang, J. T. W.; El-Gogary, R. I.; Bai, J.; Mustafa, F.; Rubio, N.; Bansal, S.; Al-Jamal, W. T.; Al-Jamal, K. T. Small 2015, 11, 4704-4722.
  15. Nacev, A.; Beni, C.; Bruno, O.; Shapiro, B. Nanomedicine 2010, 5, 1459-1466.
  16. Cole, A. J.; Yang, V. C.; David, A. E. Trends Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 323-332.
  17. Estelrich, J.; Escribano, E.; Queralt, J.; Busquets, M. A. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 8070-8101. Nano Letters Letter DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02261 Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 5652-5660
  18. Rudge, S.; Kurtz, T.; Vessely, C.; Catterall, L.; Williamson, D. Biomaterials 2000, 21, 1411-1420.
  19. Jurgons, R.; Seliger, C.; Hilpert, A.; Trahms, L.; Odenbach, S.; Alexiou, C. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2006, 18, S2893.
  20. Nacev, A.; Beni, C.; Bruno, O.; Shapiro, B. Nanomedicine (London, U. K.) 2010, 5, 1459-66.
  21. Nacev, A.; Beni, C.; Bruno, O.; Shapiro, B. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2011, 323, 651-668.
  22. Lubbe, A. S.; Bergemann, C.; Riess, H.; Schriever, F.; Reichardt, P.; Possinger, K.; Matthias, M.; Dorken, B.; Herrmann, F.; Gurtler, R. Cancer Res. 1996, 56, 4686-4693.
  23. Lubbe, A. S.; Bergemann, C.; Riess, H.; Schriever, F.; Reichardt, P.; Possinger, K.; Matthias, M.; Dorken, B.; Herrmann, F.; Gurtler, R.; Hohenberger, P.; Haas, N.; Sohr, R.; Sander, B.; Lemke, A. J.; Ohlendorf, D.; Huhnt, W.; Huhn, D. Cancer Res. 1996, 56, 4686-93.
  24. Youm, I.; Yang, X. Y.; Murowchick, J. B.; Youan, B.-B. C. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2011, 6, 1-12.
  25. Mei, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Tian, G.; Song, C.; Yang, D.; Chen, H.; Sun, H.; Tian, Y.; Liu, K.; et al. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2009, 4, 1530-1539.
  26. Fan, R.; Wang, Y.; Han, B.; Luo, Y.; Zhou, L.; Peng, X.; Wu, M.; Zheng, Y.; Guo, G. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 69, 100-107. Nano Letters Letter DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02261 Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 5652-5660

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Al-Jamal, K. T., Bai, J., Wang, J. T.-W., Protti, A., Southern, P., Bogart, L., Heidari, H., Li, X., Cakebread, A., Asker, D., Al-Jamal, W. T., Shah, A., Bals, S., Sosabowski, J., & Pankhurst, Q. A.
Affiliations
  • King’s College London , , ,
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
Corresponding author
Pankhurst, Quentin A.
Venue
Nano Letters
Published
2016-08-19
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
5652-5660
ISSN
  • 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6992
OpenAlex
W2509450930
Cited by
179
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
6.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nano Letters (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/J008656/1)
  • Kings College London (NA)
  • China Scholarship Council (NA)
  • Worldwide Cancer Research (12-1054)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Keywords
magnetic drug delivery, superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles, CT26 cells, magnetic field strength, blood circulation time, docetaxel, tumor growth inhibition, clinical translation
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Magnetics, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Models, Theoretical, Neoplasms, Drug Delivery Systems, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice, Nanocapsules, Magnetite Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review