Cited by 101

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spin–Orbit Interaction of Light in Plasmonic Lattices

Tsesses, Shai, Cohen, Kobi, Ostrovsky, Evgeny, Gjonaj, Bergin, Bartal, Guy·2019·Nano Letters

Abstract

In the past decade, the spin-orbit interaction (SOI) of light has been a driving force in the design of metamaterials, metasurfaces, and schemes for light-matter interaction. A hallmark of the spin-orbit interaction of light is the spin-based plasmonic effect, converting spin angular momentum of propagating light to near-field orbital angular momentum. Although this effect has been thoroughly investigated in circular symmetry, it has yet to be characterized in a noncircular geometry, where whirling, periodic plasmonic fields are expected. Using phase-resolved near-field microscopy, we experimentally demonstrate the SOI of circularly polarized light in nanostructures possessing dihedral symmetry. We show how interaction with hexagonal slits results in four topologically different plasmonic lattices, controlled by engineered boundary conditions, and reveal a cyclic nature of the spin-based plasmonic effect which does not exist for circular symmetry. Finally, we calculate the optical forces generated by the plasmonic lattices, predicting that light with mere spin angular momentum can exert torque on a multitude of particles in an ordered fashion to form an optical nanomotor array. Our findings may be of use in both biology and chemistry, as a means for simultaneous trapping, manipulation, and excitation of multiple objects, controlled by the polarization of light.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01343

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dissipative and entangling circuits have recently been shown to enable methods for preparing a wide range of ground states, facilitate representation of nontrivial thermal states with enhanced noise resilience, and eliminate the barren plateau effect in training quantum neural networks.

    “Such dissipative and entangling circuits have recently been shown to enable methods for preparing a wide range of ground states, facilitating the representation of nontrivial thermal states with significantly enhanced noise resilience 47 , and able to eliminate the barren plateau effect in the training of quantum neural networks 48 .”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. 10.1038/nphoton.2015.232 · DOI
  2. 10.1126/science.1234892 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1126/science.1231758 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1126/science.aaf3417 · DOI
  5. 10.1126/science.aap8640 · DOI
  6. 10.1126/science.aat9042 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1126/science.1257671 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1038/nature21037 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/nphys3732 · DOI
  10. 10.1126/science.1233746 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1126/science.1233739 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b02828 · DOI
  13. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04611 · DOI
  14. 10.1126/science.aaa9519 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1364/OPTICA.3.000118 · DOI
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.043903 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1021/nl903380j · DOI
  18. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01571 · DOI
  19. 10.1364/OPTICA.2.001045 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.121302 · DOI
  21. 10.1126/science.aaj1699 · DOI
  22. 10.1364/OPTICA.5.000283 · DOI
  23. 10.1021/nl403608a · DOI
  24. 10.1364/OE.23.032759 · DOI
  25. 10.1021/nl803460g · DOI
  26. 10.1364/OL.41.001478 · DOI
  27. 10.1021/nl400644r · DOI
  28. 10.1063/1.2348781 · DOI
  29. 10.1364/OE.17.017483 · DOI
  30. 10.1098/rspa.1987.0002 · DOI
  31. 10.1098/rspa.1974.0012 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/s41567-019-0487-7 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1109/JPHOT.2014.2363436 · DOI
  34. 10.1098/rspa.2001.0826 · DOI
  35. 10.1364/JOSAA.18.000839 · DOI
  36. 10.1002/lpor.200710038 · DOI
  37. 10.1021/nl803677x · DOI
  38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.263902 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79746-1 · DOI
  40. 10.1021/acsphotonics.8b00325 · DOI
  41. 10.1117/12.317704 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1021/nl9034434 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/nnano.2010.128 · DOI
  44. 10.1126/sciadv.1602738 · DOI
  45. 10.1364/OPEX.13.005434 · DOI
  46. 10.1002/adom.201800715 · DOI
  47. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.045424 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tsesses, S., Cohen, K., Ostrovsky, E., Gjonaj, B., & Bartal, G.
Venue
Nano Letters
Published
2019-05-02
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
4010-4016
ISSN
  • 1530-6984
  • 1530-6992
Cited by
101
References
4
Language
en
Funders
Israel Science Foundation (1802/12)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review