Cited by 446Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon ResearchOrbital Angular Momentum in OpticsMetamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications

Observation of the Spin-Based Plasmonic Effect in Nanoscale Structures

Open access
Gorodetski, Y., Niv, A., Kleiner, V., Hasman, E.·2008·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

Observation of surface-plasmon phenomena that are dependent upon the handedness of the circularly polarized incident light (spin) is presented. The polarization-dependent near-field intensity distribution obtained in our experiment is attributed to the presence of a geometric phase arising from the interaction of light with an anisotropic and inhomogeneous nanoscale structure. A near-field vortex surface mode with a spin-dependent topological charge was obtained in a plasmonic microcavity. The remarkable phenomenon of polarization-sensitive focusing in a plasmonic structure was also demonstrated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.101.043903

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Breaking the cylindrical symmetry of a nonparaxial field produces spin-Hall effect shifts.

    “Breaking the cylindrical symmetry of a nonparaxial field also produces spin-Hall effect shifts 28- 33 .”

    From Spin–orbit interactions of light (2015) · cites this paper as [29]

    The passage on p. 8 reports a spin-dependent transverse focal shift in a hemi-circular plasmonic lens and identifies it as a manifestation of the optical spin-Hall effect. The paper describes an asymmetric structure, but does not establish the claim’s specific mechanism of breaking the cylindrical symmetry of a nonparaxial field. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Illuminating only the x>0 half of a high-NA lens results in a subwavelength transverse shift of the focal spot: Y' ∝ σ/k.

    “For example, illuminating only the x > 0 half of a high-NA lens results in the subwavelength transverse shift of the focal spot 8,28- 30 : ′ Y ∝σ / k .”

    From Spin–orbit interactions of light (2015) · cites this paper as [29]

    The discussion of the plasmonic focusing lens (p. 8) reports a spin-dependent transverse focal shift of about 200 nm. But the device is a hemi-circular coupling grating illuminated by circularly polarized plane waves, not a high-NA lens with only its x>0 half illuminated; the passage also does not clearly establish the stated Y′ ∝ σ/k relation. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The spin-to-orbital AM conversion can be interpreted as an azimuthal spin-Hall effect in cylindrically-symmetric fields; breaking this symmetry results in a pronounced spin-Hall effect in the direction orthogonal to the symmetry-breaking axis.

    “The spin-to-orbital AM conversion can be interpreted as an azimuthal spin-Hall effect in cylindrically-symmetric fields 24,26,112 . Breaking this symmetry results in a pronounced spin-Hall effect in the direction orthogonal to the symmetry-breaking axis 8,28- 33 .”

    From Spin–orbit interactions of light (2015) · cites this paper as [29]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [9][9] N. Dahan, et al. Phys. Rev. B 76, 045427 (2007). -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gorodetski, Y., Niv, A., Kleiner, V., & Hasman, E.
Affiliations
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2008-07-25
Volume
101
Issue
4
Pages
043903-043903
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2043133304
Cited by
446
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 25
FWCI
11.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
Keywords
circularly polarized light, handedness, surface plasmons, Berry phase, near-field intensity distribution, topological charge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review