The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electrochemical Reduction of CO2 to CO by a Heterogeneous Catalyst of Fe–Porphyrin-Based Metal–Organic Framework
Abstract
Heterogeneous electrocatalysis provides better control of the chemical surroundings of the catalyst’s active site for improved performance, offers the possibility of overcoming drawbacks of deactivation caused by aggregation or dimerization in homogeneous condition, and permits the use of benign aqueous solutions. Employing metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) or covalent–organic frameworks (COFs) to support the active molecular catalyst of porphyrin for electrochemical conversion of CO 2 to CO is a promising strategy. We have rationally introduced a 3D highly stable porphyrin-based MOF of PCN-222(Fe) into heterogeneous catalysis through the simple dip-coating method. The composite catalyst PCN-222(Fe)/C (mass ratio = 1:2) exhibited high catalytic performance for electrochemical conversion of CO 2 to CO with 494 mV overpotential (where j = 1.2 mA cm –2 ) and maximum 91% FE CO in a CO 2 -saturated 0.5 M KHCO 3 aqueous solution, achieving a TOF of 0.336 site –1 s –1 . The catalyst was found to retain its crystallinity and stability after 10 h of electrolysis at −0.60 V versus RHE (average FE CO 80.4%; RHE, reversible hydrogen electrode), which generates 334 μmol of CO with the TOF of 0.012 s –1 (0.286 site –1 s –1 ). These results indicate that the PCN-222(Fe)/C has a substantial catalytic effect on the electrochemical reduction of CO 2 due to the combination of the intrinsic activity of the porphyrin molecule, and the promising CO 2 adsorption ability endowed by the conserved porosity, as well as the high conductivity of carbon black.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A review of catalysts for the electroreduction of carbon dioxide to produce low-carbon fuels
Qiao, J., Liu, Y., Hong, F., & Zhang, J. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c3cs60323g · Cited by 2,990
Frontiers, Opportunities, and Challenges in Biochemical and Chemical Catalysis of CO 2 Fixation
Appel, A. M., Bercaw, J. E., Bocarsly, A. B., Dobbek, H., DuBois, D. L., Dupuis, M., Ferry, J. G., Fujita, E., Hille, R., Kenis, P. J. A., et al. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300463y · Cited by 2,193
Cited by
Carbon capture and conversion using metal–organic frameworks and MOF-based materials
Ding, M., Flaig, R. W., Jiang, H.-L., & Yaghi, O. M. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00829a · Cited by 2,616
Porphyrin-based frameworks for oxygen electrocatalysis and catalytic reduction of carbon dioxide
Liang, Z., Wang, H.-Y., Zheng, H., Zhang, W., & Cao, R. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs01482f · Cited by 506
Electrocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide: opportunities with heterogeneous molecular catalysts
Sun, L., Reddu, V., Fisher, A. C., & Wang, X. (2020) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c9ee03660a · Cited by 452
MOF-based materials for photo- and electrocatalytic CO2 reduction
Li, X., & Zhu, Q.-L. (2020) · EnergyChem · doi:10.1016/j.enchem.2020.100033 · Cited by 366
A historical perspective on porphyrin-based metal–organic frameworks and their applications
Zhang, X., Wasson, M. C., Shayan, M., Berdichevsky, E. K., Ricardo-Noordberg, J., Singh, Z., Papazyan, E. K., Castro, A. J., Marino, P., Ajoyan, Z., et al. (2021) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213615 · Cited by 300
Li, J., Shen, H., Ma, C., Zhang, H., Luo, P., Chen, J., Mu, M., & Yin, X. (2023) · Electrochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2023.141896 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Dong, B.-X., Qian, S.-L., Bu, F.-Y., Wu, Y.-C., Feng, L.-G., Teng, Y.-L., Liu, W.-L., & Li, Z.-W.
- Venue
- ACS Applied Energy Materials
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-08-16
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 4662-4669
- ISSN
- 2574-0962 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2886608297
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.