Effects of Ink Formulation on Construction of Catalyst Layers for High-Performance Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells
Open accessAbstract
Rational design of catalyst layers in a membrane electrode assembly (MEA) is crucial for achieving high-performance polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Establishing a clear understanding of the property (catalyst ink)–structure (catalyst layer)–performance (MEA) relationship lays the foundation for this rational design. In this work, a synergistic approach was taken to correlate the ink formulation, the microstructure of catalyst layers, and the resulting MEA performance to establish such a property–structure–performance relationship. The solvent composition (n-PA/H 2 O mixtures) demonstrated a strong influence on the performance of the MEA fabricated with an 830-EW (Aquivion) ionomer, especially polarization losses of cell activation and mass transport. The performance differences were studied in terms of how the solvent composition affects the catalyst/ionomer interface, ionomer network, and pore structure of the resulting catalyst layers. The ionomer aggregates mainly covered the surface of catalyst aggregates acting as oxygen reduction reaction active sites, and the aggregate sizes of the ionomer and catalyst (revealed by ultrasmall angle X-ray scattering and cryo-transmission electron microscopy) were dictated by tuning the solvent composition, which in turn determined the catalyst/ionomer interface (available active sites). In n-PA/H 2 O mixtures with 50∼90 wt % H 2 O, the catalyst agglomerates could be effectively broken up into small aggregates, leading to enhanced kinetic activities. The boiling point of the mixed solvents determined the pore structure of ultimate catalyst layers, as evidenced by mercury porosimetry and scanning electron microscopy. For mixed solvents with a higher boiling point, the catalyst–ionomer aggregates in the ink tend to agglomerate during the solvent evaporation process and finally form larger catalyst–ionomer aggregates in the ultimate catalyst layer, resulting in more secondary pores and thus lower mass transport resistance. Both the enlarged catalyst/ionomer interface and appropriate pore structure were achieved with the catalyst layer fabricated from an n-PA/H 2 O mixture with 90 wt % H 2 O, leading to the best MEA performance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Solvents with high boiling points usually form larger catalyst-ionomer aggregates in the final catalyst layer, resulting in more secondary pores and lower mass transport resistance.
“For example, solvents with high boiling points usually form larger catalyst-ionomer aggregates in the final catalyst layer, resulting in more secondary pores and lower mass transport resistance [176,177].”
From Recent Advances on PEM Fuel Cells: From Key Materials to Membrane Electrode Assembly (2023) · cites this paper as [177]
Cites
Van Cleve, T., Khandavalli, S., Chowdhury, A., Medina, S., Pylypenko, S., Wang, M., More, K. L., Kariuki, N., Myers, D. J., Weber, A. Z., et al. (2019) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.9b17614 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Zhao, J., Li, X., & Liu, Z. (2019) · International Journal of Energy Research · doi:10.1002/er.4671 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Recent Advances on PEM Fuel Cells: From Key Materials to Membrane Electrode Assembly
Mo, S., Du, L., Huang, Z., Chen, J., Zhou, Y., Wu, P., Meng, L., Wang, N., Xing, L., Zhao, M., et al. (2023) · Electrochemical Energy Reviews · doi:10.1007/s41918-023-00190-w · Cited by 277 · see citing works
“For example, solvents with high boiling points usually form larger catalyst–ionomer aggregates in the final catalyst layer, resulting in more secondary pores and lower mass transport resistance [176, 177].”
Stoll, J., Jeong, J., Huynh, P., & Kjeang, E. (2024) · Journal of the Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1945-7111/ad4c11 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Su, Y., Yuan, S., Li, J., Feng, Y., Shen, S., Yan, X., & Zhang, J. (2026) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2025.116163 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gong, Q., Li, C., Liu, Y., Ilavsky, J., Guo, F., Cheng, X., & Xie, J.
- Affiliations
- Xiamen University (CN)
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
- X-Ray Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 60439, United States
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cheng, Xuan
- Xie, Jian
- Venue
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2021-07-29
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 31
- Pages
- 37004-37013
- ISSN
- 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8252
- OpenAlex
- W3186102294
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 2.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.osti.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- Purdue University Indianapolis (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
- Argonne National Laboratory (DE-AC02-06CH11357)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
- Keywords
- catalyst layer microstructure, proton exchange membrane fuel cells, membrane electrode assembly, solvent composition, catalyst agglomerates, pore structure, mass transfer resistance, oxygen reduction reaction, structure-performance relationship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review