Cited by 20Fuel Cells and Related MaterialsElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

The effect of ink dilution and evaporation on the microstructures of catalyst layers in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells

Open access
Zhao, Jian, Li, Xianguo, Liu, Zhong‐sheng·2019·International Journal of Energy Research

Abstract

The microstructures of catalyst layers (CLs) in proton exchange membrane fuel cells determine cell performance and durability. Delicate ink preparation processes and coating/drying processes affect the resulting microstructures including active sites, pore networks, ionomer networks and Pt/C networks. This paper reports our recent experimental observations of the effect of ink dilution and evaporation condition on the microstructures. The microstructures of dried ink droplets are presented and compared among different dilution ratios and different evaporation conditions in terms of the spatial distributions of Pt/C particles, ionomers, and pores. The method through which the microstructures are visualized is also introduced in this paper. It is observed that ink dilution ratio and evaporation condition can significantly alter resulting microstructure patterns through affecting viscosity and particle flow patterns during the evaporation. More concentrated solution makes catalyst inks less spread out on a substrate surface, leading to larger droplet height and larger contact angle. Ambient relative humidity has a significant impact on catalyst deposition patterns. Under low relative humidity condition, catalyst particles are concentrated both near the central and the periphery of the droplet; while under high relative humidity, the central part is uniform, and the particles move towards the edge of the deposition, forming a stripe-like structure. This indicates that ink dilution and evaporation is key to the CL microstructure formation and must be properly controlled in order to obtain the quality and consistency of the CLs in fabrication.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/er.4671

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During the solvent evaporation process, the movement, aggregation, or self-assembly of the agglomerates in the ink film occur, determining the final structure of the CL.

    “During the solvent evaporation process, the movement, aggregation, or self-assembly of the agglomerates in the ink film occur, determining the final structure of the CL [40,41].”

    From Effect of Catalyst Ink and Formation Process on the Multiscale Structure of Catalyst Layers in PEM Fuel Cells (2022) · cites this paper as [40]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says solvent evaporation determines initial catalyst-layer microstructures and affects catalyst-particle movement. Section 3.2 (page unavailable) describes particles moving and accumulating as droplets dry, but does not establish self-assembly or aggregation of agglomerates in an ink film. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • After solvent completely evaporated, resulting CL surface becomes rougher and distribution of catalyst and ionomer in resulting CLs becomes more inhomogeneous with decreasing solid concentration.

    “After the solvent is completely evaporated, the resulting CL surface becomes rougher and the distribution of catalyst and ionomer in the resulting CLs becomes more inhomogeneous with decreasing the solid concentration [40].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Li X. Principles of Fuel Cells. New York: Taylor & Francis Group; 2006.
  2. Deegan RD. Contact line deposits in an evaporation drop. Phys Rev. 2000;62(1):756-765.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, J., Li, X., & Liu, Z.
Affiliations
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • National Research Council Canada (CA)
Corresponding author
Li, Xianguo
Venue
International Journal of Energy Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-08-02
ISSN
  • 0363-907X (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-114X
OpenAlex
W2964926625
Cited by
20
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Energy Research (publishedVersion)
  • NPARC (submittedVersion)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Discovery Grant)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Keywords
catalyst layer microstructure, proton exchange membrane fuel cells, ionomer distribution, pore network, relative humidity, droplet spreading, contact angle, ink viscosity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review