Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 228

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Iron-Doped Nickel Phosphide Nanosheet Arrays: An Efficient Bifunctional Electrocatalyst for Water Splitting

Wang, Pengyan, Pu, Zonghua, Li, Yanhui, Wu, Lin, Tu, Zhengkai, Jiang, Min, Kou, Zongkui, Amiinu, Ibrahim Saana, Mu, Shichun·2017·ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Abstract

Exploring efficient and earth-abundant electrocatalysts for water splitting is crucial for various renewable energy technologies. In this work, iron (Fe)-doped nickel phosphide (Ni 2 P) nanosheet arrays supported on nickel foam (Ni 1.85 Fe 0.15 P NSAs/NF) are fabricated through a facile hydrothermal method, followed by phosphorization. The electrochemical analysis demonstrates that the Ni 1.85 Fe 0.15 P NSAs/NF electrode possesses high electrocatalytic activity for water splitting. In 1.0 M KOH, the Ni 1.85 Fe 0.15 P NSAs/NF electrode only needs overpotentials of 106 mV at 10 mA cm –2 and 270 mV at 20 mA cm –2 to drive the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER), respectively. Furthermore, the assembled two-electrode (Ni 1.85 Fe 0.15 P NSAs/NF∥Ni 1.85 Fe 0.15 P NSAs/NF) alkaline water electrolyzer can produce a current density of 10 mA cm –2 at 1.61 V. Remarkably, it can maintain stable electrolysis over 20 h. Thus, this work undoubtedly offers a promising electrocatalyst for water splitting.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsami.7b06305

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 228

Metadata

Authors
Wang, P., Pu, Z., Li, Y., Wu, L., Tu, Z., Jiang, M., Kou, Z., Amiinu, I. S., & Mu, S.
Venue
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2017-07-31
Volume
9
Issue
31
Pages
26001-26007
ISSN
  • 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8252
OpenAlex
W2735331701
Cited by
228
References
9
FWCI
9.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.