Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 269

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 378 of the 378 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bioactive Materials for Bone Regeneration: Biomolecules and Delivery Systems

Open access
Szwed-Georgiou, Aleksandra, Płociński, Przemysław, Kupikowska-Stobba, Barbara, Urbaniak, Mateusz M., Rusek-Wala, Paulina, Szustakiewicz, Konrad, Piszko, Paweł, Krupa, Agnieszka, Biernat, Monika, Gazińska, Małgorzata, Kasprzak, Mirosław, Nawrotek, Katarzyna, Mira, Nuno Pereira, Rudnicka, Karolina·2023·ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering

Abstract

Novel tissue regeneration strategies are constantly being developed worldwide. Research on bone regeneration is noteworthy, as many promising new approaches have been documented with novel strategies currently under investigation. Innovative biomaterials that allow the coordinated and well-controlled repair of bone fractures and bone loss are being designed to reduce the need for autologous or allogeneic bone grafts eventually. The current engineering technologies permit the construction of synthetic, complex, biomimetic biomaterials with properties nearly as good as those of natural bone with good biocompatibility. To ensure that all these requirements meet, bioactive molecules are coupled to structural scaffolding constituents to form a final product with the desired physical, chemical, and biological properties. Bioactive molecules that have been used to promote bone regeneration include protein growth factors, peptides, amino acids, hormones, lipids, and flavonoids. Various strategies have been adapted to investigate the coupling of bioactive molecules with scaffolding materials to sustain activity and allow controlled release. The current manuscript is a thorough survey of the strategies that have been exploited for the delivery of biomolecules for bone regeneration purposes, from choosing the bioactive molecule to selecting the optimal strategy to synthesize the scaffold and assessing the advantages and disadvantages of various delivery strategies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c00609

Cites

378 of 378 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 378 references

Cited by

See all 269

Metadata

Authors
Szwed-Georgiou, A., Płociński, P., Kupikowska-Stobba, B., Urbaniak, M. M., Rusek-Wala, P., Szustakiewicz, K., Piszko, P., Krupa, A., Biernat, M., Gazińska, M., Kasprzak, M., Nawrotek, K., Mira, N. P., & Rudnicka, K.
Venue
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
Published
2023-08-16
Volume
9
Issue
9
Pages
5222-5254
ISSN
2373-9878 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385857906
Cited by
269
References
378
FWCI
19.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bioactive Materials for Bone Regeneration: Biomolecules and Delivery Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c00609
The paper
Szwed-Georgiou, A., Płociński, P., Kupikowska-Stobba, B., Urbaniak, M. M., Rusek-Wala, P., Szustakiewicz, K., Piszko, P., Krupa, A., Biernat, M., Gazińska, M., Kasprzak, M., Nawrotek, K., Mira, N. P., & Rudnicka, K. (2023). Bioactive Materials for Bone Regeneration: Biomolecules and Delivery Systems. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c00609

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.