Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 165

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Liquid-like Solids Support Cells in 3D

Open access
Bhattacharjee, Tapomoy, Gil, Carmen J., Marshall, Samantha L., Urueña, Juan M., O’Bryan, Christopher S., Carstens, Matt, Keselowsky, Benjamin, Palmer, Glyn D., Ghivizzani, Steve, Gibbs, C. Parker, Sawyer, W. Gregory, Angelini, Thomas E.·2016·ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering

Abstract

The demands of tissue engineering have driven a tremendous amount of research effort in 3D tissue culture technology and, more recently, in 3D printing. The need to use 3D tissue culture techniques more broadly in all of cell biology is well-recognized, but the transition to 3D has been impeded by the convenience, effectiveness, and ubiquity of 2D culture materials, assays, and protocols, as well as the lack of 3D counterparts of these tools. Interestingly, progress and discoveries in 3D bioprinting research may provide the technical support needed to grow the practice of 3D culture. Here we investigate an integrated approach for 3D printing multicellular structures while using the same platform for 3D cell culture, experimentation, and assay development. We employ a liquid-like solid (LLS) material made from packed granular-scale microgels, which locally and temporarily fluidizes under the focused application of stress and spontaneously solidifies after the applied stress is removed. These rheological properties enable 3D printing of multicellular structures as well as the growth and expansion of cellular structures or dispersed cells. The transport properties of LLS allow molecular diffusion for the delivery of nutrients or small molecules for fluorescence-based assays. Here, we measure viability of 11 different cell types in the LLS medium, we 3D print numerous structures using several of these cell types, and we explore the transport properties in molecular time-release assays.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00218

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 165

Metadata

Authors
Bhattacharjee, T., Gil, C. J., Marshall, S. L., Urueña, J. M., O’Bryan, C. S., Carstens, M., Keselowsky, B., Palmer, G. D., Ghivizzani, S., Gibbs, C. P., Sawyer, W. G., & Angelini, T. E.
Venue
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
Published
2016-06-20
Volume
2
Issue
10
Pages
1787-1795
ISSN
2373-9878 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2472898939
Cited by
165
References
4
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Liquid-like Solids Support Cells in 3D. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00218
The paper
Bhattacharjee, T., Gil, C. J., Marshall, S. L., Urueña, J. M., O’Bryan, C. S., Carstens, M., Keselowsky, B., Palmer, G. D., Ghivizzani, S., Gibbs, C. P., Sawyer, W. G., & Angelini, T. E. (2016). Liquid-like Solids Support Cells in 3D. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00218

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.