Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 447

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electrochemical CO2 Reduction to Formic Acid at Low Overpotential and with High Faradaic Efficiency on Carbon-Supported Bimetallic Pd–Pt Nanoparticles

Kortlever, Ruud, Peters, Ines, Koper, Sander, Koper, Marc T. M.·2015·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

The electrochemical reduction of CO 2 has attracted significant interest recently, as it is a possible reaction for the storage of renewable energy. Here, we report on the synthesis of Pd x Pt (100– x ) /C nanoparticles and their electrocatalytic properties for the reduction of CO 2 to formic acid, compared with their activity for the reverse oxidation of formic acid to CO 2 . We find that Pd x Pt (100– x ) /C nanoparticles have a very low onset potential for the reduction of CO 2 to formic acid of ca. 0 V vs RHE, which approaches the theoretical equilibrium potential of 0.02 V vs RHE for this reaction. Furthermore, the Pd 70 Pt 30 /C catalyst shows a faradaic efficiency of 88% toward formic acid after 1 h of electrolysis at −0.4 V vs RHE with an average current density of ∼5 mA/cm 2 . Therefore, this catalyst shows a competing or even better faradaic efficiency toward formic acid compared to recently reported catalysts, at a substantially lower overpotential, while avoiding a strong deactivation that was observed with previously reported Pd-based catalysts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.5b00602

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 447

Metadata

Authors
Kortlever, R., Peters, I., Koper, S., & Koper, M. T. M.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2015-06-01
Volume
5
Issue
7
Pages
3916-3923
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2481819809
Cited by
447
References
1
FWCI
12.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.