Cited by 2,747CO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsCatalysts for Methane ReformingCarbon dioxide utilization in catalysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 178 of the 180 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Advances and challenges in understanding the electrocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide to fuels

Open access
Birdja, Yuvraj Y., Pérez-Gallent, Elena, Figueiredo, Marta C., Göttle, Adrien J., Calle-Vallejo, Federico, Koper, Marc T. M.·2019·Nature Energy

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41560-019-0450-y

Cites

178 of 178 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction enables conversion of intermittent renewable electricity from sunlight and wind into storable fuels and useful chemical products and is an important approach for CO2 conversion and utilization to meet C neutrality.

    “The electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR), enabling the conversion of intermittent renewable electricity from sunlight and wind into storable fuels and useful chemical products, is an important approach for CO2 conversion and utilization to meet the requirement of C neutrality.13,311,312”

    From Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality (2021) · cites this paper as [311]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 180 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Resasco, J. et al. Promoter effects of alkali metal cations on the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 11277–11287 (2017). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Birdja, Y. Y., Pérez-Gallent, E., Figueiredo, M. C., Göttle, A. J., Calle-Vallejo, F., & Koper, M. T. M.
Affiliations
Leiden University (NL)
Corresponding author
Koper, Marc T. M.
Venue
Nature Energy
Published
2019-09-09
Volume
4
Issue
9
Pages
732-745
ISSN
2058-7546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2972593701
Cited by
2,747
References
180
Citations by year
2026: 307 · 2025: 511 · 2024: 508 · 2023: 494 · 2022: 370 · 2021: 366 · 2020: 184 · 2019: 6
FWCI
49.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Nature Energy (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • TNO Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Shell
  • Shell Global Solutions International
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • Covestro
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
Keywords
electrochemical CO2 reduction, CO2 activation, C–C bond formation, reaction selectivity, reaction mechanism, surface structure, electrolyte effects, mass transfer, in situ spectroscopy, renewable energy storage, chemical fuels

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review