Cited by 515CO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsCarbon dioxide utilization in catalysisCatalysts for Methane Reforming

Sulfur-Modulated Tin Sites Enable Highly Selective Electrochemical Reduction of CO2 to Formate

Open access
Zheng, Xueli, De Luna, Phil, García de Arquer, F. Pelayo, Zhang, Bo, Becknell, Nigel, Ross, Michael B., Li, Yifan, Banis, Mohammad Norouzi +10 more·2017·Joule

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.joule.2017.09.014

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. [42]42. Hafner J. (2008). Ab-initio simulations of materials using VASP: Density-functional theory and beyond. J Comput Chem 29 (13) : 2044-2078.
  2. [43]43. Blöchl PE. (1994). Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50 (24) : 17953-17979.
  3. [44]44. Ernzerhof M, Scuseria GE. (1999). Assessment of the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof exchange-correlation functional. J. Chem. Phys. 110 (11) : 5029-5036.
  4. [45]45. Kresse G, Joubert D. (1999). From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59 (3) : 1758-1775.
  5. [46]46. Monkhorst HJ, Pack JD. (1976). Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 13 (12) : 5188-5192.
  6. [47]47. Hansen HA, Varley JB, Peterson AA, Norskov JK. (2013). Understanding Trends in the Electrocatalytic Activity of Metals and Enzymes for CO2 Reduction to CO. J Phys. Chem. Lett , 4 (3) : 388-392.
  7. [48]48. Bahn S, Jacobsen K. (2002) An object-oriented scripting interface to a legacy electronic structure code. Comput. Sci. Eng. 4 (3) : 56-62.
  8. [50]50. Zhang L, Song Q, Zhang SB. (2010). Exceptionally strong hydrogen bonds affect the surface energy of colloidal nanocrystals: methylamine and water adsorption on PbS. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (11) : 116101.
  9. [51]51. Connolly ML. (1983). Solvent-Accessible Surfaces of Proteins and Nucleic-Acids. Science 221 (4612) : 709-713.
  10. [52]52. Nandi; S, Luna; PD, Daff; TD, Rother; J, Vaidhyanathan R. A (2015). single-ligand ultra-microporous MOF for precombustion CO2 capture and hydrogen purification. Science Advances 1 (11) : 1-9.
  11. [54]54. Noblat J, Noelle N, Deronzier A, Ziessel R, Zsoldos D. (1994) Formation of Polymeric {Ruo(bpy)(CO)} Films by Electrochemical Reduction of [Ru(bpy) (CO)z](PF6)2: Its Implication in CO2 Electrocatalytic Reduction. Inorg. Chem. 33 (2) : 4410-4412.
  12. [55]55. Ishida H, Tanaka K, Tanaka T. (1987). Electrochemical CO2 Reduction Catalyzed by [R (bpy) (C0)] + and [Ru(bpy)(CO)CI] + . The Effect of pH on the Formation of CO and HCOO-. Organometallics 6 (4) : 181-186.
  13. [56]56. Bruce M, Megehee E, Vaidhyanathan R. (1992). Electrocatalytic Reduction of Carbon Dioxide Based on 2,2'-Bipyridyl Complexes of Osmium. Inorg Chem 31 (12) : 4864-4873.
  14. [57]57. Taheri A, Thompson EJ, Fettinger JC, Berben LA. (2015). An Iron Electrocatalyst for Selective Reduction of CO2to Formate in Water: Including Thermochemical Insights. ACS Catal. 5 (12) : 7140-7151.
  15. [58]58. Ahn ST, Bielinski EA, Lane EM, Chen Y, Bernskoetter WH, Hazari N , et al. (2015). Enhanced CO2 electroreduction efficiency through secondary coordination effects on a pincer iridium catalyst. Chem. Commun (Camb) 51 (27) : 5947-5950.
  16. [59]59. Kang P, Cheng C, Chen Z, Schauer CK, Meyer TJ, Brookhart M. (2012). Selective electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 to formate by water-stable iridium dihydride pincer complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 (12) : 5500-5503.
  17. [60]60. Hammouche M, Lexa D, Momentea M, Sav6an J. (1991). Chemical Catalysis of Electrochemical Reactions. Homogeneous Catalysis of the Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide by Iron("0") Porphyrins. Role of the Addition of Magnesium Cations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113 (8) : 8455-8466.
  18. [61]61. Appel AM, Bercaw JE, Bocarsly AB, Dobbek H, DuBois DL, Dupuis M , et al. (2013). Frontiers, opportunities, and challenges in biochemical and chemical catalysis of CO2 fixation. Chem. Rev. 113 (8) : 6621-6658.
  19. [62]62. Li, Y., Cui, F., Ross, M. B., Kim, D., Sun, Y., & Yang, P. (2017). Structure-Sensitive CO2 Electroreduction to Hydrocarbons on Ultrathin 5-fold Twinned Copper Nanowires. Nano. Lett , 17(2), 1312-1317.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zheng, X., De Luna, P., García de Arquer, F. P., Zhang, B., Becknell, N., Ross, M. B., Li, Y., Banis, M. N., Li, Y., Liu, M., Voznyy, O., Dinh, C. T., Zhuang, T., Stadler, P., Cui, Y., Du, X., Yang, P., & Sargent, E. H.
Affiliations
  • Tianjin University (CN)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • Canadian Light Source (Canada) (CA)
  • Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Sargent, Edward H.
Venue
Joule
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
794-805
ISSN
2542-4351 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2765148856
Cited by
515
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 89 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 1
FWCI
11.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Joule (publishedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ontario Research Fund - Research Excellence Program (RE08-034)
  • NSERC (RGPIN-2017-06477)
  • CIFAR Bio-Inspired Solar Energy program (FL-000560)
  • Director, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, & Biosciences Division, of the U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC02-05CH11231)
  • FWP (CH030201)
  • National Basic Research Program of China (2014CB931703)
  • Natural Science Foundation of China (51471115, 51571149)
  • China Scholarship Council (20140625004)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • National Research Council Canada
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Province of Saskatchewan
  • Western Economic Diversification Canada
  • University of Saskatchewan
  • Director, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC02-05CH11231)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Keywords
electrochemical CO2 reduction, undercoordinated sites, Faradaic efficiency, catalyst stability, renewable energy storage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review