Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 534

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Charge-Transfer Effects in Ni–Fe and Ni–Fe–Co Mixed-Metal Oxides for the Alkaline Oxygen Evolution Reaction

Bates, Michael K., Jia, Qingying, Doan, Huong, Liang, Wentao, Mukerjee, Sanjeev·2016·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

Ni–Fe and Ni–Fe–Co mixed-metal oxide (MMO) films were investigated as electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in 0.1 M KOH. In an effort to optimize MMO morphology, aniline was used as a capping agent to produce high-surface-area Ni–Fe–Co films on Raney nickel supports. This catalyst exhibits enhanced mass activity in comparison to the Ni–Fe OER electrocatalysts reported to date. Cyclic voltammetry shows changes in the potential of the Ni 2+/3+ transitions in Fe- or Co-containing MMO films. In situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) analysis confirms that Fe acts to stabilize Ni in the 2+ oxidation state, while Co facilitates oxidation to the 3+ state. The results of this study support the recent claims that Fe (not Ni) is the OER active site. The OER enhancement of the ternary Ni–Fe–Co catalyst results from two effects: (1) the charge-transfer effects of Co result in the formation of the conductive Ni III OOH phase at lower overpotential, thus activating the Fe sites which are otherwise inaccessible to electron transfer in the nonconductive Ni II (OH) 2 host lattice, and (2) XAS analysis shows that the presence of Co effectively “shrinks” the Ni and Fe local geometry, likely resulting in an optimized Fe–OH/OOH bond strength. In addition, analysis of heat-treatment effects indicates that calcination at 400 °C improves the OER activity of Ni–Fe–Co but deactivates Ni–Fe. Annealing studies under argon show that MMO surfaces with a hydrated Ni(OH) 2 phase and a crystalline NiO phase exhibit nearly identical OER activities. Finally, the morphology of the MMO catalyst film on Raney Ni support provides excellent catalyst dispersion and should result in high active-site utilization for use in technologically relevant gas-diffusion electrodes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.5b01481

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Bates, M. K., Jia, Q., Doan, H., Liang, W., & Mukerjee, S.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2015-12-04
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
155-161
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2246170947
Cited by
534
References
5
FWCI
10.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.