The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanistic Understanding of Alloy Effect and Water Promotion for Pd-Cu Bimetallic Catalysts in CO2 Hydrogenation to Methanol
Abstract
Density functional theory (DFT) calculations on Pd-Cu bimetallic catalysts reveal that the stepped PdCu(111) surface with coordinatively unsaturated Pd atoms exposed on the top is superior for CO 2 and H 2 activation and for CO 2 hydrogenation to methanol in comparison to the flat Cu-rich PdCu 3 (111) surface. The energetically preferred path for CO 2 to CH 3 OH over PdCu(111) proceeds through CO 2 * → HCOO* → HCOOH* → H 2 COOH* → CH 2 O* → CH 3 O* → CH 3 OH*. CO formation from CO 2 via a reverse water-gas shift (RWGS) proceeds more quickly than CH 3 OH formation in terms of kinetic calculations, in line with experimental observation. A small amount of water, which is produced in situ from both RWGS and CH 3 OH formation, can accelerate CO 2 conversion to methanol by reducing the kinetic barriers for O–H bond formation steps and enhancing the TOF. Water participation in the reaction alters the rate-limiting step according to the degree of rate control (DRC) analysis. In comparison to CO 2, CO hydrogenation to methanol on PdCu(111) encounters higher barriers and thus is slower in kinetics. Complementary to the DFT results, CO 2 hydrogenation experiments over SiO 2 -supported bimetallic catalysts show that the Pd-Cu(0.50) that is rich in a PdCu alloy phase is more selective to methanol than the PdCu 3 -rich Pd-Cu(0.25). Moreover, advanced CH 3 OH selectivity is also evidenced on Pd-Cu(0.50) at a specific water vapor concentration (0.03 mol %), whereas that of Pd-Cu(0.25) is not comparable. The present work clearly shows that the PdCu alloy surface structure has a major effect on the reaction pathway, and the presence of water can substantially influence the kinetics in CO 2 hydrogenation to methanol.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A fast and robust algorithm for Bader decomposition of charge density
Henkelman, G., Arnaldsson, A., & Jónsson, H. (2006) · Computational Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.010 · Cited by 10,723
Recent advances in catalytic hydrogenation of carbon dioxide
Wang, W., Wang, S., Ma, X., & Gong, J. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c1cs15008a · Cited by 3,316
Cited by
Kovačič, Ž., Likozar, B., & Huš, M. (2020) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.0c02557 · Cited by 474
Li, H., Fang, W., Wang, L.-X., Liu, Y., Liu, L., Sun, T., Liao, C., Zhu, Y., Wang, L., & Xiao, F.-S. (2023) · The Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2023.100445 · Cited by 67
Direct CO2 Hydrogenation over Bifunctional Catalysts to Produce Dimethyl Ether—A Review
Ebrahimian, S., & Bhattacharya, S. (2024) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en17153701 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Nie, X., Jiang, X., Wang, H., Luo, W., Janik, M. J., Chen, Y., Guo, X., & Song, C.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-04-18
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 4873-4892
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2800573980
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.