Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 932

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 166 of the 166 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Catalysis by Metal Organic Frameworks: Perspective and Suggestions for Future Research

Yang, Dong, Gates, Bruce C.·2019·ACS Catalysis
DOI 10.1021/acscatal.8b04515
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Metal organic frameworks (MOFs) have drawn wide attention as potential catalysts, offering high densities of catalytic sites in high-area porous solids, some with stabilities at high temperatures. The field is at an early stage, characterized by numerous discoveries and novel demonstrations of catalytic properties associated with the crystalline structures of MOFs, but applications of MOFs as catalysts are still lacking. In this perspective we summarize advantages and limitations of MOFs as catalysts and fundamental issues to be addressed about their potential applications. MOF framework compositions and pore structures can strongly influence catalytic performance, allowing, for example, shape-selective and bifunctional catalysis, but research is needed to quantify reaction/transport processes in MOFs, identify catalytic sites, and determine intrinsic catalytic reaction rates. Progress is hindered by the lack of understanding of the heterogeneity of MOFs, with catalytic sites sometimes being in structures such as defects not determined by X-ray diffraction crystallography. Determination of the dynamics of MOFs and their catalytic sites, as well as the intrinsic kinetics of catalytic reactions, will help to advance guidelines for synthesizing optimum catalysts. Further, MOFs present challenges related to stability and regeneration as catalysts, some associated with the unique nature of MOFs, such as the node–linker bonds, which can break during catalysis. There are opportunities to understand these matters in depth and to find conditions of catalytic operation that minimize the processes leading to deactivation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.8b04515

Cites

166 of 166 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 166 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Yang, D., & Gates, B. C.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2019-01-15
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
1779-1798
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1021/acscatal.8b04515
OpenAlex
W2910111753
Cited by
932
References
166
FWCI
41.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.