The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Selectivity Control for Electrochemical CO2 Reduction by Charge Redistribution on the Surface of Copper Alloys
Abstract
Copper is a significant platform for CO 2 electroreduction catalysts because it is the only known metal to produce multi-carbon products but suffers from poor selectivity. In the early stages of the reaction pathway, a selectivity-determining step dictates if the pathway leads to formate (a dead-end) or to CO (and on to multi-carbon products). Therefore, controlling the adsorption of key intermediates, in order to steer the reaction pathway as desired, is critical for selective CO 2 electroreduction. Alloying copper is a strategy in which the composition and electronic properties of the alloy surface can be finely tuned to alter the reaction intermediate adsorption behavior. Herein, through in situ Raman spectroscopy and density functional theory (DFT) calculations, we investigate a composition-dependent selectivity toward CO and formate during CO 2 electroreduction on a range of Cu–Sn alloy catalysts. We find that the selectivity shifts from CO to formate generation as the Sn content in the alloy catalyst increases because of a shift in adsorption preference from the C-bound *COOH intermediate to the O-bound *OCHO intermediate. Theoretical DFT calculation results indicate that this selectivity shift is due to a gradual weakening of *COOH adsorption and strengthening of *OCHO that occurs with increasing Sn content. A combination of theoretical Bader charge analysis and experimental X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy revealed the origin of such transformation: upon alloying, charge is redistributed from Sn to Cu, which creates regions of localized positive charge on the Sn sites. Therefore, with increasing tin content, these localized positive sites hinder the nucleophilic attack of the CO 2 carbon, making *COOH adsorption (and the CO pathway) less favorable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Design of electrocatalysts for oxygen- and hydrogen-involving energy conversion reactions
Jiao, Y., Zheng, Y., Jaroniec, M., & Qiao, S. Z. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00470a · Cited by 5,388
Self-citationNew insights into the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide on metallic copper surfaces
Kuhl, K. P., Cave, E. R., Abram, D. N., & Jaramillo, T. F. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee21234j · Cited by 3,160
Frontiers, Opportunities, and Challenges in Biochemical and Chemical Catalysis of CO 2 Fixation
Appel, A. M., Bercaw, J. E., Bocarsly, A. B., Dobbek, H., DuBois, D. L., Dupuis, M., Ferry, J. G., Fujita, E., Hille, R., Kenis, P. J. A., et al. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300463y · Cited by 2,193
Activity Descriptors for CO 2 Electroreduction to Methane on Transition-Metal Catalysts
Peterson, A. A., & Nørskov, J. K. (2012) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/jz201461p · Cited by 1,667
What Should We Make with CO2 and How Can We Make It?
Bushuyev, O. S., De Luna, P., Dinh, C. T., Tao, L., Saur, G., van de Lagemaat, J., Kelley, S. O., & Sargent, E. H. (2018) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2017.09.003 · Cited by 1,593
Verma, S., Hamasaki, Y., Kim, C., Huang, W., Lu, S., Jhong, H.-R. M., Gewirth, A. A., Fujigaya, T., Nakashima, N., & Kenis, P. J. A. (2018) · ACS Energy Letters · doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.7b01096 · Cited by 521
Cheng, T., Xiao, H., & Goddard, W. A. (2016) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.6b08534 · Cited by 453
Cited by
Electrocatalysis for CO 2 conversion: from fundamentals to value-added products
Wang, G., Chen, J., Ding, Y., Cai, P., Yi, L., Li, Y., Tu, C., Hou, Y., Wen, Z., & Dai, L. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00071j · Cited by 1,295
Yang, P.-P., Zhang, X.-L., Gao, F.-Y., Zheng, Y.-R., Niu, Z.-Z., Yu, X., Liu, R., Wu, Z.-Z., Qin, S., Chi, L.-P., et al. (2020) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.0c01699 · Cited by 709
Self-citationGong, Y., Jiao, L., Qian, Y., Pan, C., Zheng, L., Cai, X., Liu, B., Yu, S., & Jiang, H. (2020) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201914977 · Cited by 592
Electrochemical CO2 reduction (CO2RR) to multi-carbon products over copper-based catalysts
Woldu, A. R., Huang, Z., Zhao, P., Hu, L., & Astruc, D. (2022) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2021.214340 · Cited by 578
Jiao, L., Yang, W., Wan, G., Zhang, R., Zheng, X., Zhou, H., Yu, S., & Jiang, H. (2020) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202008787 · Cited by 412
Metadata
- Authors
- Vasileff, A., Zhi, X., Xu, C., Ge, L., Jiao, Y., Zheng, Y., & Qiao, S.-Z.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-09-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 9411-9417
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2972039871
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 6.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.