Cited by 453CO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCatalysts for Methane Reforming

Reaction Mechanisms for the Electrochemical Reduction of CO2 to CO and Formate on the Cu(100) Surface at 298 K from Quantum Mechanics Free Energy Calculations with Explicit Water

Open access
Cheng, Tao, Xiao, Hai, Goddard, William A.·2016·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Copper is the only elemental metal that reduces a significant fraction of CO 2 to hydrocarbons and alcohols, but the atomistic reaction mechanism that controls the product distributions is not known because it has not been possible to detect the reaction intermediates on the electrode surface experimentally, or to carry out Quantum Mechanics (QM) calculations with a realistic description of the electrolyte (water). Here, we carry out QM calculations with an explicit description of water on the Cu(100) surface (experimentally shown to be stable under CO 2 reduction reaction conditions) to examine the initial reaction pathways to form CO and formate (HCOO – ) from CO 2 through free energy calculations at 298 K and pH 7. We find that CO formation proceeds from physisorbed CO 2 to chemisorbed CO 2 (*CO 2 δ− ), with a free energy barrier of Δ G ⧧ = 0.43 eV, the rate-determining step (RDS). The subsequent barriers of protonating *CO 2 δ− to form COOH* and then dissociating COOH* to form *CO are 0.37 and 0.30 eV, respectively. HCOO – formation proceeds through a very different pathway in which physisorbed CO 2 reacts directly with a surface H* (along with electron transfer), leading to Δ G ⧧ = 0.80 eV. Thus, the competition between CO formation and HCOO – formation occurs in the first electron-transfer step. On Cu(100), the RDS for CO formation is lower, making CO the predominant product. Thus, to alter the product distribution, we need to control this first step of CO 2 binding, which might involve controlling pH, alloying, or changing the structure at the nanoscale.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.6b08534

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Hori, Y.; Murata, A.; Takahashi, R. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1989, 85, 2309.
  2. Kuhl, K. P.; Cave, E. R.; Abram, D. N.; Jaramillo, T. F. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 7050.
  3. Schouten, K. J. P.; Kwon, Y.; van der Ham, C. J. M.; Qin, Z.; Koper, M. T. M. Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 1902.
  4. Kortlever, R.; Shen, J.; Schouten, K. J. P.; Calle-Vallejo, F.; Koper, M. T. M. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 4073.
  5. Hori, Y. In Modern Aspects of Electrochemistry; Vayenas, C., White, R., Gamboa-Aldeco, M., Eds.; Springer New York: 2008; Vol. 42, p 89.
  6. Gattrell, M.; Gupta, N.; Co, A. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2006, 594, 1.
  7. Hori, Y.; Takahashi, I.; Koga, O.; Hoshi, N. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem 2003, 199, 39.
  8. Hori, Y.; Murata, A.; Takahashi, R.; Suzuki, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 5022.
  9. Hori, Y.; Takahashi, R.; Yoshinami, Y.; Murata, A. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 7075.
  10. Peterson, A. A.; Abild-Pedersen, F.; Studt, F.; Rossmeisl, J.; Norskov, J. K. Energy Environ. Sci. 2010, 3, 1311.
  11. Calle-Vallejo, F.; Koper, M. T. M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 7282.
  12. Nie, X.; Esopi, M. R.; Janik, M. J.; Asthagiri, A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 2459.
  13. Schouten, K. J. P.; Calle-Vallejo, F.; Koper, M. T. M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 10858.
  14. Cheng, T.; Xiao, H.; Goddard, W. A. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 4767.
  15. Montoya, J. H.; Shi, C.; Chan, K.; Nørskov, J. K. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 2032.
  16. Goodpaster, J. D.; Bell, A. T.; Head-Gordon, M. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 1471.
  17. Luo, W.; Nie, X.; Janik, M. J.; Asthagiri, A. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 219.
  18. Xiao, H.; Cheng, T.; Goddard, W. A.; Sundararaman, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 483.
  19. Nie, X.; Luo, W.; Janik, M. J.; Asthagiri, A. J. Catal. 2014, 312, 108.
  20. Voter, A. F.; Montalenti, F.; Germann, T. C. Ann. Rev. Mater. Res. 2002, 32, 321.
  21. Ensing, B.; De Vivo, M.; Liu, Z.; Moore, P.; Klein, M. L. Acc. Chem. Res. 2006, 39, 73.
  22. Laio, A.; Parrinello, M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002, 99, 12562.
  23. Iannuzzi, M.; Laio, A.; Parrinello, M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 90, 238302.
  24. Fleurat-Lessard, P.; Ziegler, T. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 123, 084101.
  25. Laio, A.; Rodriguez-Fortea, A.; Gervasio, F. L.; Ceccarelli, M.; Parrinello, M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 6714.
  26. Ensing, B.; Laio, A.; Parrinello, M.; Klein, M. L. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 6676.
  27. Kim, Y.-G.; Baricuatro, J. H.; Javier, A.; Gregoire, J. M.; Soriaga, M. P. Langmuir 2014, 30, 15053.
  28. van Duin, A. C. T.; Bryantsev, V. S.; Diallo, M. S.; Goddard, W. A.; Rahaman, O.; Doren, D. J.; Raymand, D.; Hermansson, K. J. Phys. Chem. A 2010, 114, 9507.
  29. Abd Elhamid, M. H.; Ateya, B. G.; Weil, K. G.; Pickering, H. W. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2000, 147, 2148.
  30. Freund, H. J.; Messmer, R. P. Surf. Sci. 1986, 172, 1.
  31. Freund, H. J.; Roberts, M. W. Surf. Sci. Rep. 1996, 25, 225.
  32. Legon, A. C.; Millen, D. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1987, 16, 467.
  33. Graciani, J.; Mudiyanselage, K.; Xu, F.; Baber, A. E.; Evans, J.; Senanayake, S. D.; Stacchiola, D. J.; Liu, P.; Hrbek, J.; Sanz, J. F.; Rodriguez, J. A. Science 2014, 345, 546.
  34. Todoroki, M.; Hara, K.; Kudo, A.; Sakata, T. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1995, 394, 199. Insert Table of Contents artwork here

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheng, T., Xiao, H., & Goddard, W. A.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Goddard, William A.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2016-10-17
Volume
138
Issue
42
Pages
13802-13805
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2529973511
Cited by
453
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 20
FWCI
8.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Office of Science (DE-SC0004993)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Keywords
electrochemical CO2 reduction, copper electrode, Cu(100) surface, reaction mechanism, CO formation, formate formation, explicit water, activation barrier, rate-determining step, CO2 chemisorption, protonation, surface hydroxyl groups, product distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review