Cited by 25Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsGlycosylation and Glycoproteins ResearchNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Microglia Mediate Contact-Independent Neuronal Network Remodeling via Secreted Neuraminidase-3 Associated with Extracellular Vesicles

Open access
Delaveris, Corleone S., Wang, Catherine L., Riley, Nicholas M., Li, Sherry, Kulkarni, Rishikesh U., Bertozzi, Carolyn R.·2023·ACS Central Science

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Neurons communicate with each other through electrochemical transmission at synapses. Microglia, the resident immune cells of the central nervous system, modulate this communication through a variety of contact-dependent and -independent means. Microglial secretion of active sialidase enzymes upon exposure to inflammatory stimuli is one unexplored mechanism of modulation. Recent work from our lab showed that treatment of neurons with bacterial sialidases disrupts neuronal network connectivity. Here, we find that activated microglia secrete neuraminidase-3 (Neu3) associated with fusogenic extracellular vesicles. Furthermore, we show that Neu3 mediates contact-independent disruption of neuronal network synchronicity through neuronal glycocalyx remodeling. We observe that NEU3 is transcriptionally upregulated upon exposure to inflammatory stimuli and that a genetic knockout of NEU3 abrogates the sialidase activity of inflammatory microglial secretions. Moreover, we demonstrate that Neu3 is associated with a subpopulation of extracellular vesicles, possibly exosomes, that are secreted by microglia upon inflammatory insult. Finally, we demonstrate that Neu3 is necessary and sufficient to both desialylate neurons and decrease neuronal network connectivity. These results implicate Neu3 in remodeling of the glycocalyx leading to aberrant network-level activity of neurons, with implications in neuroinflammatory diseases such as Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscentsci.3c01066

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Liposome fusion is a method to directly modify EVs.

    “Liposome fusion is also a method to directly modify EVs [225].”

    From Extracellular vesicles as nanotheranostic platforms for targeted neurological disorder interventions (2024) · cites this paper as [225]

    The Results and Discussion section describes microglial EVs carrying Neu3 and EV fusion with neuronal membranes, not liposome fusion as a method for directly modifying EVs. Searches for “liposome fusion,” “EV modification,” and “liposome” found no passage addressing that method. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kulkarni R. U.; Wang C. L.; Bertozzi C. R. Subthreshold Voltage Analysis Demonstrates Neuronal Cell-Surface Sialic Acids Modulate Excitability and Network Integration. bioRxiv 2020, 2020.04.07.030866.
  2. Nomura K.; Vilalta A.; Allendorf D. H.; Hornik T. C.; Brown G. C. Activated Microglia Desialylate and Phagocytose Cells via Neuraminidase, Galectin-3, and Mer Tyrosine Kinase. J. Immunol. 2017, 198 (12), 4792– 4801. 10.4049/jimmunol.1502532. 28500071 PMC5458330 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Delaveris, C. S., Wang, C. L., Riley, N. M., Li, S., Kulkarni, R. U., & Bertozzi, C. R.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Kulkarni, Rishikesh U.
  • Bertozzi, Carolyn R.
Venue
ACS Central Science
Published
2023-10-31
Volume
9
Issue
11
Pages
2108-2114
ISSN
  • 2374-7943 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-7951
OpenAlex
W4388084096
Cited by
25
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Central Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Division of Graduate Education (DGE-114747)
  • Stanford University
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM058867, K99GM147304)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
microglia, neuraminidase, extracellular vesicles, exosomes, neuronal network connectivity, desialylation, neuroinflammation, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review