The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward Highly Reversible Magnesium–Sulfur Batteries with Efficient and Practical Mg[B(hfip)4]2 Electrolyte
Abstract
The rechargeable magnesium (Mg) battery has been considered a promising candidate for future battery generations due to unique advantages of the Mg metal anode. The combination of Mg with a sulfur cathode is one of the attractive electrochemical energy storage systems that use safe, low-cost, and sustainable materials and could potentially provide a high energy density. To develop a suitable electrolyte remains the key challenge for realization of a magnesium sulfur (Mg–S) battery. Herein, we demonstrate that magnesium tetrakis(hexafluoroisopropyloxy) borate Mg[B(hfip) 4 ] 2 (hfip = OC(H)(CF 3 ) 2 ) satisfies a multitude of requirements for an efficient and practical electrolyte, including high anodic stability (>4.5 V), high ionic conductivity (∼11 mS cm –1 ), and excellent long-term Mg cycling stability with a low polarization. Insightful mechanistic studies verify the reversible redox processes of Mg–S chemistry by utilizing Mg[B(hfip) 4 ] 2 electroylte and also unveil the origin of the voltage hysteresis in Mg–S batteries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Rechargeable Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Manthiram, A., Fu, Y., Chung, S.-H., Zu, C., & Su, Y.-S. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500062v · Cited by 4,665
Self-citationChallenges Facing Lithium Batteries and Electrical Double‐Layer Capacitors
Choi, N., Chen, Z., Freunberger, S. A., Ji, X., Sun, Y., Amine, K., Yushin, G., Nazar, L. F., Cho, J., & Bruce, P. G. (2012) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201201429 · Cited by 2,700
A cost and resource analysis of sodium-ion batteries
Vaalma, C., Buchholz, D., Weil, M., & Passerini, S. (2018) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2018.13 · Cited by 2,613
Designing high-energy lithium–sulfur batteries
Seh, Z. W., Sun, Y., Zhang, Q., & Cui, Y. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00410a · Cited by 2,573
Prototype systems for rechargeable magnesium batteries
Aurbach, D., Lu, Z., Schechter, A., Gofer, Y., Gizbar, H., Turgeman, R., Cohen, Y., Moshkovich, M., & Levi, E. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35037553 · Cited by 2,355
A new class of Solvent-in-Salt electrolyte for high-energy rechargeable metallic lithium batteries
Suo, L., Hu, Y.-S., Li, H., Armand, M., & Chen, L. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2513 · Cited by 2,314
Quest for Nonaqueous Multivalent Secondary Batteries: Magnesium and Beyond
Muldoon, J., Bucur, C. B., & Gregory, T. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500049y · Cited by 1,376
Odyssey of Multivalent Cathode Materials: Open Questions and Future Challenges
Canepa, P., Sai Gautam, G., Hannah, D. C., Malik, R., Liu, M., Gallagher, K. G., Persson, K. A., & Ceder, G. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00614 · Cited by 1,159
Materials Challenges and Opportunities of Lithium Ion Batteries
Manthiram, A. (2011) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/jz1015422 · Cited by 1,065
Self-citation
Cited by
Tian, Y., Zeng, G., Rutt, A., Shi, T., Kim, H., Wang, J., Koettgen, J., Sun, Y., Ouyang, B., Chen, T., et al. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00767 · Cited by 1,614
Current status and future directions of multivalent metal-ion batteries
Liang, Y., Dong, H., Aurbach, D., & Yao, Y. (2020) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-020-0655-0 · Cited by 1,521
Current Status and Future Prospects of Metal–Sulfur Batteries
Chung, S., & Manthiram, A. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201901125 · Cited by 622
Self-citationMotiwala, H. F., Armaly, A. M., Cacioppo, J. G., Coombs, T. C., Koehn, K. R. K., Norwood, V. M., & Aubé, J. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00749 · Cited by 593
Zhao, M., Yao, Y., Dong, X., Baqar, M., Fang, B., Chen, H., & Sun, H. (2023) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.3c05859 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao-Karger, Z., Liu, R., Dai, W., Li, Z., Diemant, T., Vinayan, B. P., Bonatto Minella, C., Yu, X., Manthiram, A., Behm, R. J., Ruben, M., & Fichtner, M.
- Venue
- ACS Energy Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-07-25
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2005-2013
- ISSN
- 2380-8195 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2883273814
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 11.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward Highly Reversible Magnesium–Sulfur Batteries with Efficient and Practical Mg[B(hfip)4]2 Electrolyte. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acsenergylett.8b01061
- The paper
- Zhao-Karger, Z., Liu, R., Dai, W., Li, Z., Diemant, T., Vinayan, B. P., Bonatto Minella, C., Yu, X., Manthiram, A., Behm, R. J., Ruben, M., & Fichtner, M. (2018). Toward Highly Reversible Magnesium–Sulfur Batteries with Efficient and Practical Mg[B(hfip)4]2 Electrolyte. ACS Energy Letters. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.8b01061
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
