Cited by 380Wound Healing and TreatmentsAdvancements in Transdermal Drug DeliveryElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

Multifunctional magnesium organic framework-based microneedle patch for accelerating diabetic wound healing

Yin, Mengting, Wu, Jiayingzi, Deng, Mingwu, Wang, Pei, Ji, Guangyu, Wang, Mingsong, Zhou, Chaohui, Blum, Nicholas Thomas +5 more·2021·ACS Nano

Abstract

Abstract Diabetic wound healing is one of the major challenges in the biomedical fields. The conventional single drug treatments have unsatisfactory efficacy, and the drug delivery effectiveness is restricted by the penetration depth. Herein, we develop a magnesium organic framework-based microneedle patch (denoted as MN-MOF-GO-Ag) that can realize transdermal delivery and combination therapy for diabetic wound healing. Multifunctional magnesium organic frameworks (Mg-MOFs) are mixed with poly­(γ-glutamic acid) (γ-PGA) hydrogel and loaded into the tips of MN-MOF-GO-Ag, which slowly releases Mg2+ and gallic acid in the deep layer of the dermis. The released Mg2+ induces cell migration and endothelial tubulogenesis, while gallic acid, a reactive oxygen species-scavenger, promotes antioxidation. Besides, the backing layer of MN-MOF-GO-Ag is made of γ-PGA hydrogel and graphene oxide-silver nanocomposites (GO-Ag) which further enables excellent antibacterial effects for accelerating wound healing. The therapeutic effects of MN-MOF-GO-Ag on wound healing are demonstrated with the full-thickness cutaneous wounds of a diabetic mouse model. The significant improvement of wound healing is achieved for mice treated with MN-MOF-GO-Ag.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsnano.1c06036

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Yin, M., Wu, J., Deng, M., Wang, P., Ji, G., Wang, M., Zhou, C., Blum, N. T., Zhang, W., Shi, H., Jia, N., Wang, X., & Huang, P.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • Shenzhen University (CN)
  • Shanghai Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhang, Wenjie
  • Jia, Nengqin
  • Wang, Xiansong
  • Huang, Peng
Venue
ACS Nano
Published
2021-11-11
Volume
15
Issue
11
Pages
17842-17853
ISSN
  • 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-086X
OpenAlex
W3213604708
Cited by
380
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 91 · 2024: 104 · 2023: 92 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 1
FWCI
30.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACS Nano (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (2019CXJQ01)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (31971271, 81671839)
  • Basic Research Program of Shenzhen (JCYJ20170412111100742, JCYJ20180507182413022, JCYJ20200109105620482)
  • Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (KQTD20190929172538530)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Keywords
microneedle patch, diabetic wound healing, transdermal drug delivery, gallic acid, magnesium ion release, antibacterial wound dressing, reactive oxygen species scavenging, endothelial tubulogenesis, combination therapy
MeSH terms
Animals, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Diabetes Mellitus, Gallic Acid, Magnesium, Wound Healing, Hydrogels, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review