The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward More Reliable Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: An All-Graphene Cathode Structure
Abstract
Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries are attracting increasing interest due to their high theoretical specific energy density, low cost, and eco-friendliness. However, most reports of the high gravimetric specific capacity and long cyclic life are not practically reliable because of their low areal specific capacity derived from the low areal sulfur loading and low sulfur content. Here, we fabricated a highly porous graphene with high pore volume of 3.51 cm(3) g(-1) as the sulfur host, enabling a high sulfur content of 80 wt %, and based on this, we further proposed an all-graphene structure for the sulfur cathode with highly conductive graphene as the current collector and partially oxygenated graphene as a polysulfide-adsorption layer. This cathode structural design enables a 5 mg cm(-2) sulfur-loaded cathode showing both high initial gravimetric specific capacity (1500 mAh g(-1)) and areal specific capacity (7.5 mAh cm(-2)), together with excellent cycling stability for 400 cycles, indicating great promise for more reliable lithium-sulfur batteries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Wang, Z., Dong, Y., Li, H., Zhao, Z., Bin Wu, H., Hao, C., Liu, S., Qiu, J., & Lou, X. W. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6002 · Cited by 1,059
Cited by
Review on High‐Loading and High‐Energy Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Peng, H., Huang, J., Cheng, X., & Zhang, Q. (2017) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201700260 · Cited by 1,746
Porous Carbons: Structure‐Oriented Design and Versatile Applications
Tian, W., Zhang, H., Duan, X., Sun, H., Shao, G., & Wang, S. (2020) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201909265 · Cited by 657
Current Status and Future Prospects of Metal–Sulfur Batteries
Chung, S., & Manthiram, A. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201901125 · Cited by 622
3D Graphene Materials: From Understanding to Design and Synthesis Control
Sun, Z., Fang, S., & Hu, Y. H. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00083 · Cited by 543
A review of recent developments in rechargeable lithium–sulfur batteries
Kang, W., Deng, N., Ju, J., Li, Q., Wu, D., Ma, X., Li, L., Naebe, M., & Cheng, B. (2016) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c6nr04923k · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Fang, R., Zhao, S., Pei, S., Qian, X., Hou, P.-X., Cheng, H.-M., Liu, C., & Li, F.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-08-19
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 8676-8682
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2513287540
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
