The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Increased Gold Nanoparticle Retention in Brain Tumors by in Situ Enzyme-Induced Aggregation
Abstract
The treatment of brain tumors remains a challenge due to the limited accumulation of drugs and nanoparticles. Here, we triggered the aggregation of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) using legumain to enhance the retention of chemotherapeutics in brain tumors. This nanoplatform, AuNPs-A&C, is comprised of Ala-Ala-Asn-Cys-Lys modified AuNPs (AuNPs-AK) and 2-cyano-6-aminobenzothiazole modified AuNPs (AuNPs-CABT). AuNPs-AK could be hydrolyzed to expose the 1,2-thiolamino groups on AuNPs-AK in the presence of legumain, which occurs by a click cycloaddition with the contiguous cyano group on AuNPs-CABT, resulting in formation of AuNPs aggregates. This strategy led to an enhanced retention of the AuNPs in glioma cells both in vitro and in vivo due to the blocking of nanoparticle exocytosis and minimizing nanoparticle backflow to the bloodstream. After conjugation of doxorubicin (DOX) via a pH-sensitive linker to AuNPs-A&C, the efficiency for treating glioma was improved. The median survival time for the DOX-linked AuNPs-A&C increased to 288% in comparison to the saline group. We further show the use of the AuNPs-A&C for optical imaging applications. In conclusion, we provide a strategy to increase nanoparticle tumor accumulation with the potential to improve therapeutic outcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Accumulation of sub-100 nm polymeric micelles in poorly permeable tumours depends on size
Cabral, H., Matsumoto, Y., Mizuno, K., Chen, Q., Murakami, M., Kimura, M., Terada, Y., Kano, M. R., Miyazono, K., Uesaka, M., et al. (2011) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2011.166 · Cited by 2,429
Immunological properties of engineered nanomaterials
Dobrovolskaia, M. A., & McNeil, S. E. (2007) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2007.223 · Cited by 1,823
Han, L., Kong, D. K., Zheng, M.-Q., Murikinati, S., Ma, C., Yuan, P., Li, L., Tian, D., Cai, Q., Ye, C., et al. (2016) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b07573 · Cited by 122
Cited by
Recent progress in drug delivery
Li, C., Wang, J., Wang, Y., Gao, H., Wei, G., Huang, Y., Yu, H., Gan, Y., Wang, Y., Mei, L., et al. (2019) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2019.08.003 · Cited by 818
Self-citationPreparation and application of pH-responsive drug delivery systems
Ding, H., Tan, P., Fu, S., Tian, X., Zhang, H., Ma, X., Gu, Z., & Luo, K. (2022) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.05.056 · Cited by 645
Size-Tunable Strategies for a Tumor Targeted Drug Delivery System
Yu, W., Liu, R., Zhou, Y., & Gao, H. (2020) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.9b01139 · Cited by 489
Self-citationRecent advances in selective photothermal therapy of tumor
Zhao, L., Zhang, X., Wang, X., Guan, X., Zhang, W., & Ma, J. (2021) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12951-021-01080-3 · Cited by 445
Tumor‐Microenvironment‐Responsive Nanomedicine for Enhanced Cancer Immunotherapy
Peng, S., Xiao, F., Chen, M., & Gao, H. (2022) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202103836 · Cited by 441
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruan, S., Hu, C., Tang, X., Cun, X., Xiao, W., Shi, K., He, Q., & Gao, H.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-11-11
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 10086-10098
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2550127991
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
