The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In Vivo Targeting and Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of Tumor with Intrinsically Radioactive Metal–Organic Frameworks Nanomaterials
Open accessAbstract
Nanoscale metal–organic frameworks (nMOF) materials represent an attractive tool for various biomedical applications. Due to the chemical versatility, enormous porosity, and tunable degradability of nMOFs, they have been adopted as carriers for delivery of imaging and/or therapeutic cargos. However, the relatively low stability of most nMOFs has limited practical in vivo applications. Here we report the production and characterization of an intrinsically radioactive UiO-66 nMOF ( 89 Zr-UiO-66) with incorporation of positron-emitting isotope zirconium-89 ( 89 Zr). 89 Zr-UiO-66 was further functionalized with pyrene-derived polyethylene glycol (Py–PGA-PEG) and conjugated with a peptide ligand (F3) to nucleolin for targeting of triple-negative breast tumors. Doxorubicin (DOX) was loaded onto UiO-66 with a relatively high loading capacity (1 mg DOX/mg UiO-66) and served as both a therapeutic cargo and a fluorescence visualizer in this study. Functionalized 89 Zr-UiO-66 demonstrated strong radiochemical and material stability in different biological media. Based on the findings from cellular targeting and in vivo positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, we can conclude that 89 Zr-UiO-66/Py–PGA-PEG-F3 can serve as an image-guidable, tumor-selective cargo delivery nanoplatform. In addition, toxicity evaluation confirmed that properly PEGylated UiO-66 did not impose acute or chronic toxicity to the test subjects. With selective targeting of nucleolin on both tumor vasculature and tumor cells, this intrinsically radioactive nMOF can find broad application in cancer theranostics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Application of zirconium MOFs in drug delivery and biomedicine
Abánades Lázaro, I., & Forgan, R. S. (2019) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2018.09.009 · Cited by 678
Smart Nanomaterials in Cancer Theranostics: Challenges and Opportunities
Kashyap, B. K., Singh, V. V., Solanki, M. K., Kumar, A., Ruokolainen, J., & Kesari, K. K. (2023) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.2c07840 · Cited by 348
Biocompatibility and biodegradability of metal organic frameworks for biomedical applications
Singh, N., Qutub, S., & Khashab, N. M. (2021) · Journal of Materials Chemistry B · doi:10.1039/d1tb01044a · Cited by 303
Multifunctional metal–organic framework heterostructures for enhanced cancer therapy
Liu, J., Huang, J., Zhang, L., & Lei, J. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00178c · Cited by 285
Li, L., Wang, J., Kong, H., Zeng, Y., & Liu, G. (2018) · Science and Technology of Advanced Materials · doi:10.1080/14686996.2018.1528850 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, D., Yang, D., Dougherty, C. A., Lu, W., Wu, H., He, X., Cai, T., Van Dort, M. E., Ross, B. D., & Hong, H.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-03-28
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 4315-4327
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2603383977
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Vivo Targeting and Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of Tumor with Intrinsically Radioactive Metal–Organic Frameworks Nanomaterials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acsnano.7b01530
- The paper
- Chen, D., Yang, D., Dougherty, C. A., Lu, W., Wu, H., He, X., Cai, T., Van Dort, M. E., Ross, B. D., & Hong, H. (2017). In Vivo Targeting and Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of Tumor with Intrinsically Radioactive Metal–Organic Frameworks Nanomaterials. ACS Nano. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b01530
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.