The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanopore Sensing of Protein Folding
Open accessAbstract
Single-molecule studies of protein folding hold keys to unveiling protein folding pathways and elusive intermediate folding states-attractive pharmaceutical targets. Although conventional single-molecule approaches can detect folding intermediates, they presently lack throughput and require elaborate labeling. Here, we theoretically show that measurements of ionic current through a nanopore containing a protein can report on the protein's folding state. Our all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations show that the unfolding of a protein lowers the nanopore ionic current, an effect that originates from the reduction of ion mobility in proximity to a protein. Using a theoretical model, we show that the average change in ionic current produced by a folding-unfolding transition is detectable despite the orientational and conformational heterogeneity of the folded and unfolded states. By analyzing millisecond-long all-atom MD simulations of multiple protein transitions, we show that a nanopore ionic current recording can detect folding-unfolding transitions in real time and report on the structure of folding intermediates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD
Phillips, J. C., Braun, R., Wang, W., Gumbart, J., Tajkhorshid, E., Villa, E., Chipot, C., Skeel, R. D., Kalé, L., & Schulten, K. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20289 · Cited by 16,914
Protein folding and misfolding
Dobson, C. M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02261 · Cited by 4,791
THEORY OF PROTEIN FOLDING: The Energy Landscape Perspective
Onuchic, J. N., Luthey-Schulten, Z., & Wolynes, P. G. (1997) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.48.1.545 · Cited by 2,210
How fast-folding proteins fold
Lindorff-Larsen, K., Piana, S., Dror, R. O., & Shaw, D. E. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1208351 · Cited by 1,980
The Protein-Folding Problem, 50 Years On
Dill, K. A., & MacCallum, J. L. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1219021 · Cited by 1,699
Cell biology of protein misfolding: the examples of Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases
Selkoe, D. J. (2004) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1104-1054 · Cited by 863
Cited by
Single-molecule protein sensing in a nanopore: a tutorial
Varongchayakul, N., Song, J., Meller, A., & Grinstaff, M. W. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00106e · Cited by 282
QuipuNet: Convolutional Neural Network for Single-Molecule Nanopore Sensing
Misiunas, K., Ermann, N., & Keyser, U. F. (2018) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b01709 · Cited by 82
Semenyshyn, R., Hentschel, M., Stanglmair, C., Teutsch, T., Tarin, C., Pacholski, C., Giessen, H., & Neubrech, F. (2019) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02372 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Si, W., & Aksimentiev, A.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-07-13
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 7091-7100
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2735310269
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 6.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.