Cited by 22Carbon Nanotubes in CompositesUltrasound and Cavitation PhenomenaMesoporous Materials and Catalysis

Ultrasonic Synthesis of Carbon Nanotube-Titanium Dioxide Composites: Process Optimization via Response Surface Methodology

Open access
Zaib, Qammer, Jouiad, Mustapha, Ahmad, Farrukh·2019·ACS Omega

Abstract

In this study, the central composite design of response surface methodology was applied to optimize the ultrasonic synthesis of multiwalled carbon nanotube-titanium dioxide (MWNT-TiO2) composites. Twenty composites were prepared by adjusting three parameters (MWNT concentration in water, sonication to disperse/exfoliate MWNTs in water, and sonication to attach TiO2 onto MWNTs) at five levels. On the basis of the experimental design, semiempirical expressions were developed, analyzed, statistically assessed, and subsequently applied to predict the impact of the studied parameters on composite synthesis. The composite synthesis process was optimized to capture the experimental conditions favoring the highest productivity (i.e., MWNT-TiO2 formation or percent TiO2 attachment) utilizing minimal resources. The synthesis process optimization results showed that, to make a MWNT-TiO2 composite in 10 mL of water, 23.2 mg (∼99% of 23.4 mg) of TiO2 can be attached to 2.6 mg of MWNTs. This process requires only 727 J sonication energy, of which 592 J is invested to exfoliate MWNTs (Sonication 1) and 135 J to attach TiO2 (Sonication 2) to MWNTs. Finally, the optimally synthesized composite was extensively characterized using SEM, surface area and porosity analysis, TGA, and ζ-potential analysis/DLS. Also, this composite was tested for stability under variable pH and solvent polarity. The approach developed in this study could be used to optimize the synthesis process of other similar composites.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsomega.8b02706

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The RSM model exhibited satisfactory approximation of actual Cr(VI) adsorption removal, with a high correlation coefficient R2 of 0.99, implying that 99% of variations in results can be attributed to studied factors.

    “The RSM model exhibited satisfactory approximation of the actual Cr(VI) adsorption removal (%), as demonstrated by the high correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.99 (Fig. 3), implying that 99% of the variations in the results can be attributed to the studied factors34,35.”

    From Optimized removal of hexavalent chromium from water using spent tea leaves treated with ascorbic acid (2022) · cites this paper as [35]

    The Results and Discussion, under “Model Development and Fitting” (page not provided), report a good fit between predicted and experimental values for two RSM responses. But those responses are MWNT expansion and TiO₂ attachment, not Cr(VI) adsorption removal, and the reported regression coefficient is approximately 0.9, not 0.99. The source therefore does not support the claim that 99% of variation in Cr(VI) removal was attributable to the studied factors. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Raj K. J. A.; Viswanathan B. Effect of surface area, pore volume and particle size of P25 titania on the phase transformation of anatase to rutile. Indian J. Chem., Sect. A: Inorg., Bio-inorg., Phys., Theor. Anal. Chem. 2009, 48, 1378– 1382.
  2. Santos H. M.; Lodeiro C.; Capelo-Martínez J.-L. The Power of Ultrasound. In Ultrasound in Chemistry: Analytical Applications; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Berlin, 2009; pp 1– 16.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zaib, Q., Jouiad, M., & Ahmad, F.
Affiliations
Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE)
Corresponding author
Ahmad, Farrukh
Venue
ACS Omega
Published
2019-01-08
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
535-545
ISSN
2470-1343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2910069005
Cited by
22
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Omega (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Masdar Institute of Science and Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Carbon Nanotubes in Composites
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis
Keywords
multi-walled carbon nanotubes, titanium dioxide, sonochemical synthesis, sonochemical exfoliation, process optimization, composite stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review