Cited by 6,075Optimal Experimental Design MethodsSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesAnalytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals

Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry

Bezerra, Marcos Almeida, Santelli, Ricardo Erthal, Oliveira, Eliane Padua, Villar, Leonardo Silveira, Escaleira, Luciane Amélia·2008·Talanta

Abstract

A review about the application of response surface methodology (RSM) in the optimization of analytical methods is presented. The theoretical principles of RSM and steps for its application are described to introduce readers to this multivariate statistical technique. Symmetrical experimental designs (three-level factorial, Box-Behnken, central composite, and Doehlert designs) are compared in terms of characteristics and efficiency. Furthermore, recent references of their uses in analytical chemistry are presented. Multiple response optimization applying desirability functions in RSM and the use of artificial neural networks for modeling are also discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.talanta.2008.05.019

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bezerra, M. A., Santelli, R. E., Oliveira, E. P., Villar, L. S., & Escaleira, L. A.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal Fluminense (BR)
Corresponding author
Bezerra, Marcos Almeida
Venue
Talanta
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-09-15
Volume
76
Issue
5
Pages
965-977
ISSN
0039-9140 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088376206
Cited by
6,075
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 495 · 2025: 482 · 2024: 467 · 2023: 468 · 2022: 412 · 2021: 538 · 2020: 597 · 2019: 535 · 2018: 436 · 2017: 393 · 2016: 305 · 2015: 284 · 2014: 229 · 2013: 158 · 2012: 115
FWCI
79.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Talanta (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimal Experimental Design Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
Keywords
response surface methodology, analytical method optimization, experimental design, Box-Behnken design, central composite design, Doehlert design, factorial design, multi-response optimization, desirability function, artificial neural networks, multivariate analysis
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Chemistry Techniques, Analytical, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review