The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biological Leaching and Chemical Precipitation Methods for Recovery of Co and Li from Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries
Abstract
Abstract Spent Li-ion batteries (LIBs) are highly rich in cobalt and lithium that need to be recovered to reduce shortages of these valuable metals and decrease their potential environmental risks. This study applied bioleaching using Aspergillus niger strains MM1 and SG1 and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans 80191 for removal of Co and Li from spent LIB under type 1 and type 2 conditions. Moreover, metal recovery was attempted from the fungal leaching solution by sodium sulfide, sodium hydroxide, and sodium oxalate for Co and then for Li using sodium carbonate. The findings of this work show that metal removal in fungal bioleaching under type 2 system was highly comparable or even better than bacterial or acid leaching. A significant quantity of Co (82%) and Li (100%) dissolution was observed in strain MM1; however, metal solubilization was poor in strain 80191 because only 22% Co and 66% Li solubilized. A high amount of Co precipitated potentially as cobalt sulfide (100%), cobalt hydroxide (100%), or cobalt oxalate (88%), whereas Li precipitated as lithium carbonate (73.6%). Finally, results of this study suggest that fungal bioleaching could be an environmentally friendly approach for solubilization and recovery of considerable quantities of metals from spent LIBs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bioleaching: Metal solubilization by microorganisms
Bosecker, K. (1997) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.1997.tb00340.x · Cited by 962
Mishra, D., Kim, D.-J., Ralph, D. E., Ahn, J.-G., & Rhee, Y.-H. (2008) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2007.01.010 · Cited by 413
Cited by
Progresses in Sustainable Recycling Technology of Spent Lithium‐Ion Batteries
Du, K., Ang, E. H., Wu, X., & Liu, Y. (2022) · ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS · doi:10.1002/eem2.12271 · Cited by 458
A review on the recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) by the bioleaching approach
Roy, J. J., Cao, B., & Madhavi, S. (2021) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130944 · Cited by 346
Self-citationAbidli, A., Huang, Y., Ben Rejeb, Z., Zaoui, A., & Park, C. B. (2022) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133102 · Cited by 194
Recent advances in the recovery of metals from waste through biological processes
Yu, Z., Han, H., Feng, P., Zhao, S., Zhou, T., Kakade, A., Kulshrestha, S., Majeed, S., & Li, X. (2020) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122416 · Cited by 152
Roadmap for a sustainable circular economy in lithium-ion and future battery technologies
Harper, G. D. J., Kendrick, E., Anderson, P. A., Mrozik, W., Christensen, P., Lambert, S., Greenwood, D., Das, P. K., Ahmeid, M., Milojevic, Z., et al. (2023) · Journal of Physics: Energy · doi:10.1088/2515-7655/acaa57 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Biswal, B. K., Jadhav, U. U., Madhaiyan, M., Ji, L., Yang, E.-H., & Cao, B.
- Venue
- ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-07-17
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 12343-12352
- ISSN
- 2168-0485 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2884123563
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biological Leaching and Chemical Precipitation Methods for Recovery of Co and Li from Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b02810
- The paper
- Biswal, B. K., Jadhav, U. U., Madhaiyan, M., Ji, L., Yang, E.-H., & Cao, B. (2018). Biological Leaching and Chemical Precipitation Methods for Recovery of Co and Li from Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b02810
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
