Cited by 413Metal Extraction and BioleachingExtraction and Separation ProcessesRecycling and Waste Management Techniques

Bioleaching of metals from spent lithium ion secondary batteries using Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans.

Mishra, Debaraj, Kim, Dong-Jin, Ralph, D.E., Ahn, Jong-Gwan, Rhee, Young-Ha·2008·Waste Management

Abstract

Bioleaching of spent lithium ion secondary batteries, containing LiCoO2, was attempted in this investigation. The present study was carried out using chemolithotrophic and acidophilic bacteria Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, which utilized elemental sulfur and ferrous ion as the energy source to produce metabolites like sulfuric acids and ferric ion in the leaching medium. These metabolites helped dissolve metals from spent batteries. Bio-dissolution of cobalt was found to be faster than lithium. The effect of initial Fe(II) concentration, initial pH and solid/liquid (w/v) ratio during bioleaching of spent battery wastes were studied in detail. Higher Fe(II) concentration showed a decrease in dissolution due co-precipitation of Fe(III) with the metals in the residues. The higher solid/liquid ratio (w/v) also affected the metal dissolution by arresting the cell growth due to increased metal concentration in the waste sample. An EDXA mapping was carried out to compare the solubility of both cobalt and lithium, and the slow dissolution rate was clearly found from the figures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.01.010

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bioleaching or biomining employs microbes such as Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans that can bind and recover metals, bypassing the need for high temperatures and toxic chemicals.

    “One alternative is bioleaching or biomining, which employs microbes such as Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans that can bind and recover metals, bypassing the need for high temperatures and toxic chemicals [87–90].”

    From The potential of biofuels from first to fourth generation (2023) · cites this paper as [87]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mishra, D., Kim, D.-J., Ralph, D. E., Ahn, J.-G., & Rhee, Y.-H.
Affiliations
  • Chungnam National University (KR)
  • Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KR)
  • Murdoch University (AU)
Corresponding author
Mishra, Debaraj
Venue
Waste Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-01
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
333-338
ISSN
0956-053X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044573969
Cited by
413
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 13
FWCI
3.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Waste Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Metal Extraction and Bioleaching
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
Keywords
bioleaching, spent lithium-ion batteries, Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, LiCoO2, cobalt recovery, lithium recovery, metal dissolution, ferrous ions, elemental sulfur, acidophilic bacteria, co-precipitation, solid-to-liquid ratio, pH effect, battery waste recycling
MeSH terms
Cobalt, Conservation of Natural Resources, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Iron, Lithium, Electric Power Supplies, Sulfur, Sulfuric Acids, Waste Products, Acidithiobacillus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review