Cited by 11Microbial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionGene Regulatory Network AnalysisBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

Interlaboratory Reproducibility in Growth and Reporter Expression in the Cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803

Open access
Mager, Maurice, Pineda Hernandez, Hugo, Brandenburg, Fabian, López-Maury, Luis, McCormick, Alistair J., Nürnberg, Dennis J., Orthwein, Tim, Russo, David A. +5 more·2023·ACS Synthetic Biology

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide In recent years, a plethora of new synthetic biology tools for use in cyanobacteria have been published; however, their reported characterizations often cannot be reproduced, greatly limiting the comparability of results and hindering their applicability. In this interlaboratory study, the reproducibility of a standard microbiological experiment for the cyanobacterial model organism Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 was assessed. Participants from eight different laboratories quantified the fluorescence intensity of mVENUS as a proxy for the transcription activity of the three promoters P J 23100, P rhaBAD, and P petE over time. In addition, growth rates were measured to compare growth conditions between laboratories. By establishing strict and standardized laboratory protocols, reflecting frequently reported methods, we aimed to identify issues with state-of-the-art procedures and assess their effect on reproducibility. Significant differences in spectrophotometer measurements across laboratories from identical samples were found, suggesting that commonly used reporting practices of optical density values need to be supplemented by cell count or biomass measurements. Further, despite standardized light intensity in the incubators, significantly different growth rates between incubators used in this study were observed, highlighting the need for additional reporting requirements of growth conditions for phototrophic organisms beyond the light intensity and CO 2 supply. Despite the use of a regulatory system orthogonal to Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, P rhaBAD, and a high level of protocol standardization, ∼32% variation in promoter activity under induced conditions was found across laboratories, suggesting that the reproducibility of other data in the field of cyanobacteria might be affected similarly.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acssynbio.3c00150

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Various inducible promoter systems have been adapted for cyanobacteria, including metal-responsive promoters such as PpetE, which reacts to copper levels, and sugar-responsive systems like PrhaBAD, activated by rhamnose presence.

    “Various inducible promoter systems have been adapted for cyanobacteria, including metal-responsive promoters such as PpetE, which reacts to copper levels, and sugar-responsive systems like PrhaBAD, activated by rhamnose presence [104,105].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mager, M., Pineda Hernandez, H., Brandenburg, F., López-Maury, L., McCormick, A. J., Nürnberg, D. J., Orthwein, T., Russo, D. A., Victoria, A. J., Wang, X., Zedler, J. A. Z., Branco dos Santos, F., & Schmelling, N. M.
Affiliations
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
  • Molecular Microbial Physiology Group, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, Amsterdam 1098 XH, The Netherlands
  • Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE)
  • Instituto de Bioquímica Vegetal y Fotosíntesis, University of Seville − CSIC, Américo Vespucio 49, 41092 Sevilla, Spain
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Corresponding author
Schmelling, Nicolas M.
Venue
ACS Synthetic Biology
Published
2023-05-29
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
1823-1835
ISSN
2161-5063 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4378639830
Cited by
11
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Synthetic Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Deposito de Investigacion Universidad de Sevilla (University of Seville) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Universitätsbibliothek der FU Berlin Hochschulschriftenstelle u. Dokumentenserver (cc-by)
Funders
  • Darwin Trust of Edinburgh
  • European Regional Development Fund (100361842)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CRC 1127/2 239748522, ID 390713860, NU 421/1)
  • H2020 LEIT Biotechnology (760994)
  • Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/S020128/1)
  • Agencia Estatal de Investigación,Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (PID2020-112645GB-I00)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
interlaboratory reproducibility, Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, cyanobacteria, promoter activity, growth rate variability, optical density measurement, cell counting, biomass measurement, synthetic biology tools
MeSH terms
Promoter Regions, Genetic, Reproducibility of Results, Genes, Reporter, Biomass, Synechocystis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review