The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fast Vibrational Imaging of Single Cells and Tissues by Stimulated Raman Scattering Microscopy
Open accessAbstract
Traditionally, molecules are analyzed in a test tube. Taking biochemistry as an example, the majority of our knowledge about cellular content comes from analysis of fixed cells or tissue homogenates using tools such as immunoblotting and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. These tools can indicate the presence of molecules but do not provide information on their location or interaction with each other in real time, restricting our understanding of the functions of the molecule under study. For real-time imaging of labeled molecules in live cells, fluorescence microscopy is the tool of choice. Fluorescent labels, however, are too bulky for small molecules such as fatty acids, amino acids, and cholesterol. These challenges highlight a critical need for development of chemical imaging platforms that allow in situ or in vivo analysis of molecules. Vibrational spectroscopy based on spontaneous Raman scattering is widely used for label-free analysis of chemical content in cells and tissues. However, the Raman process is a weak effect, limiting its application for fast chemical imaging of a living system. With high imaging speed and 3D spatial resolution, coherent Raman scattering microscopy is enabling a new approach for real-time vibrational imaging of single cells in a living system. In most experiments, coherent Raman processes involve two excitation fields denoted as pump at ωp and Stokes at ωs. When the beating frequency between the pump and Stokes fields (ωp - ωs) is resonant with a Raman-active molecular vibration, four major coherent Raman scattering processes occur simultaneously, namely, coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) at (ωp - ωs) + ωp, coherent Stokes Raman scattering (CSRS) at ωs - (ωp - ωs), stimulated Raman gain (SRG) at ωs, and stimulated Raman loss (SRL) at ωp. In SRG, the Stokes beam experiences a gain in intensity, whereas in SRL, the pump beam experiences a loss. Both SRG and SRL belong to stimulated Raman scattering (SRS), in which the energy difference between the pump and Stokes fields is transferred to the molecule for vibrational excitation. The SRS signal appears at the same wavelengths as the excitation fields and is commonly extracted through a phase-sensitive detection scheme. The detected intensity change because of a Raman transition is proportional to Im[χ(3)]IpIs, where χ(3) represents the third-order nonlinear susceptibility, Ip and Is stand for the intensity of the pump and Stokes fields. In this Account, we discuss the most recent advances in the technical development and enabling applications of SRS microscopy. Compared to CARS, the SRS contrast is free of nonresonant background. Moreover, the SRS intensity is linearly proportional to the density of target molecules in focus. For single-frequency imaging, an SRS microscope offers a speed that is ∼1000 times faster than a line-scan Raman microscope and 10,000 times faster than a point-scan Raman microscope. It is important to emphasize that SRS and spontaneous Raman scattering are complementary to each other. Spontaneous Raman spectroscopy covers the entire window of molecular vibrations, which allows extraction of subtleties via multivariate analysis. SRS offers the speed advantage by focusing on either a single Raman band or a defined spectral window of target molecules. Integrating single-frequency SRS imaging and spontaneous Raman spectroscopy on a single platform allows quantitative compositional analysis of objects inside single live cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Alkyne-Tag Raman Imaging for Visualization of Mobile Small Molecules in Live Cells
Yamakoshi, H., Dodo, K., Palonpon, A., Ando, J., Fujita, K., Kawata, S., & Sodeoka, M. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja308529n · Cited by 461
Highly Nonlinear Photodamage in Two-Photon Fluorescence Microscopy
Hopt, A., & Neher, E. (2001) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(01)76173-5 · Cited by 442
Label‐Free Live‐Cell Imaging of Nucleic Acids Using Stimulated Raman Scattering Microscopy
Zhang, X., Roeffaers, M. B. J., Basu, S., Daniele, J. R., Fu, D., Freudiger, C. W., Holtom, G. R., & Xie, X. S. (2012) · ChemPhysChem · doi:10.1002/cphc.201100890 · Cited by 171
Cited by
Vibrational spectroscopic imaging of living systems: An emerging platform for biology and medicine
Cheng, J.-X., & Xie, X. S. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa8870 · Cited by 874
Self-citationRaman spectroscopy: techniques and applications in the life sciences
Shipp, D. W., Sinjab, F., & Notingher, I. (2017) · Advances in Optics and Photonics · doi:10.1364/aop.9.000315 · Cited by 396
Hu, F., Lamprecht, M. R., Wei, L., Morrison, B., & Min, W. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep39660 · Cited by 367
Stimulated Raman Scattering: From Bulk to Nano
Prince, R. C., Frontiera, R. R., & Potma, E. O. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00545 · Cited by 350
Recent advances in petahertz electric field sampling
Herbst, A., Scheffter, K., Bidhendi, M. M., Kieker, M., Srivastava, A., & Fattahi, H. (2022) · Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6455/ac8032 · Cited by 40
Multimodal Metabolic Imaging Reveals Pigment Reduction and Lipid Accumulation in Metastatic Melanoma
Lee, H. J., Chen, Z., Collard, M., Chen, F., Chen, J. G., Wu, M., Alani, R. M., & Cheng, J.-X. (2021) · BME Frontiers · doi:10.34133/2021/9860123 · Cited by 38
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, D., Wang, P., Slipchenko, M. N., & Cheng, J.-X.
- Venue
- Accounts of Chemical Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-05-28
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2282-2290
- ISSN
- 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4898
- OpenAlex
- W2322743658
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.