The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Synthesis and Grafting of Thioctic Acid−PEG−Folate Conjugates onto Au Nanoparticles for Selective Targeting of Folate Receptor-Positive Tumor Cells
Abstract
This paper reports the creation of Au nanoparticles (AuNP) that are soluble in aqueous solution over a broad range of pH and ionic strength values and that are capable of selective uptake by folate receptor positive (FR+) cancer cells. A novel poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) construct with thioctic acid and folic acid coupled on opposite ends of the polymer chain was synthesized for targeting the AuNP to FR+ tumor cells via receptor-mediated endocytosis. These folic acid-PEG-thioctic acid conjugates were grafted onto 10-nm-diameter Au particles in aqueous solution. The resulting folate-PEG-coated nanoparticles do not aggregate over a pH range of from 2 to 12 and at electrolyte concentrations of up to 0.5 M NaCl with particle concentrations as high as 1.5 x 10(13) particles/mL. Transmission electron microscopy was used to document the performance of these coated nanoparticles in cell culture. Selective uptake of folate-PEG grafted AuNPs by KB cells, a FR+ cell line that overexpress the folate receptor, was observed. AuNP uptake was minimal in cells that (1) do not overexpress the folate receptor, (2) were exposed to AuNP lacking the folate-PEG conjugate, or (3) were co-incubated with free folic acid in large excess relative to the folate-PEG grafted AuNP. Understanding this process is an important step in the development of methods that use targeted metal nanoparticles for tumor imaging and ablation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maeda, H. (2001) · Advances in Enzyme Regulation · doi:10.1016/s0065-2571(00)00013-3 · Cited by 2,495
Cited by
Applications of Nanoparticles in Biology
De, M., Ghosh, P. S., & Rotello, V. M. (2008) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200703183 · Cited by 1,547
Smart nanocarrier-based drug delivery systems for cancer therapy and toxicity studies: A review
Hossen, S., Hossain, M. K., Basher, M. K., Mia, M. N. H., Rahman, M. T., & Uddin, M. J. (2019) · Journal of Advanced Research · doi:10.1016/j.jare.2018.06.005 · Cited by 998
Nanoparticle-Based Immunotherapy for Cancer
Shao, K., Singha, S., Clemente-Casares, X., Tsai, S., Yang, Y., & Santamaria, P. (2015) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn5062029 · Cited by 470
PEGylated nanomedicines: recent progress and remaining concerns
Vllasaliu, D., Fowler, R., & Stolnik, S. (2014) · Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery · doi:10.1517/17425247.2014.866651 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Dixit, V., Van den Bossche, J., Sherman, D. M., Thompson, D. H., & Andres, R. P.
- Venue
- Bioconjugate Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-05-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 603-609
- ISSN
- 1043-1802 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4812
- OpenAlex
- W2057427618
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.