The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Key Determinants of Receptor Activation in the agr Autoinducing Peptides of Staphylococcus aureus
Abstract
Staphylococcal pathogenesis is regulated by a two-component quorum-sensing system, agr, activated upon binding of a self-coded autoinducing peptide (AIP) to the receptor-histidine kinase, AgrC. The AIPs consist of a thiolactone macrocyle and an exocyclic "tail", both of which are important for function. In this report, characterization of the unique AIPs from the four known agr specificity groups of Staphylococcus aureus has been completed, along with analysis of cross-group inhibition of AgrC activation by each of the four AIPs. The following conclusions have been drawn: (i) The native thiolactone macrocyle and tail are necessary and sufficient for full activation by the AIPs, whereas the AIP-I macrocycle alone is a partial agonist. (ii) The native N-terminus is less critical, as that of AIP-I can be modified without affecting bioactivity, although that of AIP-III cannot. (iii) The ring and tail may function differently in different AIPs. Thus the group I and IV AIPs differ at a single (endocyclic) residue, which is the determinant of AIP specificity for these two groups and is essential for function. A similarly critical residue in AIP-II, however, is exocyclic. (iv) Cross-inhibition is more tolerant of sequence and structural diversity than is activation, suggesting that the AIPs interact differently with cognate than with heterologous receptors. (v) Chimeric peptides, in which the tails and macrocycles are switched, do not activate and instead inhibit receptor activation. These data suggest a model in which activation and inhibition involves different binding orientations within the ligand binding pocket of each receptor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stimulus Perception in Bacterial Signal-Transducing Histidine Kinases
Mascher, T., Helmann, J. D., & Unden, G. (2006) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00020-06 · Cited by 721
Quorum-sensing regulation in staphylococci—an overview
Le, K. Y., & Otto, M. (2015) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.01174 · Cited by 490
Peptide Signaling in the Staphylococci
Thoendel, M., Kavanaugh, J. S., Flack, C. E., & Horswill, A. R. (2011) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr100370n · Cited by 438
Combating Multidrug‐Resistant Bacteria: Current Strategies for the Discovery of Novel Antibacterials
O'Connell, K. M. G., Hodgkinson, J. T., Sore, H. F., Welch, M., Salmond, G. P. C., & Spring, D. R. (2013) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201209979 · Cited by 435
Regulation of virulence determinants in Staphylococcus aureus: complexity and applications
Bronner, S., Monteil, H., & Prévost, G. (2004) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2003.09.003 · Cited by 434
Metadata
- Authors
- Lyon, G. J., Wright, J. S., Muir, T. W., & Novick, R. P.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-07-13
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 31
- Pages
- 10095-10104
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2139426406
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Key Determinants of Receptor Activation in the agr Autoinducing Peptides of Staphylococcus aureus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi026049u
- The paper
- Lyon, G. J., Wright, J. S., Muir, T. W., & Novick, R. P. (2002). Key Determinants of Receptor Activation in the agr Autoinducing Peptides of Staphylococcus aureus. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi026049u
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.