The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High-Affinity Binding of Tumor-Suppressor Protein p53 and HMGB1 to Hemicatenated DNA Loops
Abstract
We have recently observed that chromatin architectural protein HMGB1 (previously reported to be involved in numerous biological processes such as DNA replication, recombination, repair, tumor growth, and metastasis) could bind with extremely high affinity (K(d) < 1 pM) to a novel DNA structure that forms a DNA loop maintained at its base by a hemicatenane (hcDNA). The loop of hcDNA contains a track of repetitive sequences derived from CA-microsatellites. Here, we report using a gel-retardation assay that tumor-suppressor protein p53 can also bind to hcDNA. p53 is a crucial molecule protecting cells from malignant transformation by regulating cell-cycle progression, apoptosis, and DNA repair by activation or repression of transcription of its target genes by binding to specific p53 DNA-binding sites and/or certain types of DNA lesions or alternative DNA structures. The affinity of p53 for hcDNA (containing sequences with no resemblance to the p53 DNA consensus sequence) is >40-fold higher (K(d) approximately 0.5 nM) than that for its natural specific binding sites within its target genes (Mdm2 promoter). Binding of p53 to hcDNA remains detectable in the presence of up to approximately 4 orders of magnitude of mass excess of competitor linear DNA, suggesting a high specificity of the interaction. p53 displays a higher affinity for hcDNA than for DNA minicircles (lacking functional p53-specific binding sequence) with a size similar to that of the loop within the hcDNA, indicating that the extreme affinity of p53 for hcDNA is likely due to the binding of the protein to the hemicatenane. Although binding of p53 to hcDNA occurs in the absence of the nonspecific DNA-binding extreme carboxy-terminal regulatory domain (30-C, residues 363-393), the isolated 30-C domain (but not the sequence-specific p53 "core domain", residues 94-312) can also bind hcDNA. Only the full-length p53 can form stable ternary complexes with hcDNA and HMGB1. The possible biological relevance of p53 and HMGB1 binding to hemicatenanes is discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Release of chromatin protein HMGB1 by necrotic cells triggers inflammation
Scaffidi, P., Misteli, T., & Bianchi, M. E. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00858 · Cited by 4,221
Ko, L. J., & Prives, C. (1996) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.10.9.1054 · Cited by 2,344
HMG1 and 2, and related ‘architectural’ DNA-binding proteins
Thomas, J. O., & Travers, A. A. (2001) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0968-0004(01)01801-1 · Cited by 618
Specific Recognition of Cruciform DNA by Nuclear Protein HMG1
Bianchi, M. E., Beltrame, M., & Paonessa, G. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2922595 · Cited by 601
Regulation of the p53 Tumor Suppressor Protein
Oren, M. (1999) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.274.51.36031 · Cited by 564
Specific Binding of Chromosomal Protein HMG1 to DNA Damaged by the Anticancer Drug Cisplatin
Pil, P. M., & Lippard, S. J. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1566071 · Cited by 496
Identification of double holliday junctions as intermediates in meiotic recombination
Schwacha, A., & Kleckner, N. (1995) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(95)90191-4 · Cited by 488
SRY, like HMG1, recognizes sharp angles in DNA.
Ferrari, S., Harley, V. R., Pontiggia, A., Goodfellow, P. N., Lovell-Badge, R., & Bianchi, M. E. (1992) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05551.x · Cited by 441
Lee, S., Elenbaas, B., Levine, A., & Griffith, J. (1995) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(05)80006-6 · Cited by 405
HMGB proteins and gene expression
Agresti, A., & Bianchi, M. E. (2003) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/s0959-437x(03)00023-6 · Cited by 394
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- Wang X. W., 1996, Cancer Surv. 28, 169−196.
- Sturzberger H. W., 1996, EMBO J., 15
- Lee S., 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272
- Bakalkin G., 1994, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91
- Thomas J. O., 2001, DNA-binding proteins, Trends Biochem. Sci. 26, 167−174.
- Agresti A., 2003, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 13, 170−178.
- Jaouen S., 2004, Binding of HMG-box proteins to hemicatenated DNA loops, unpublished results
- Štros M., 1994, FEBS Lett., 343
- Pospíšilová S., 2003, Biochem. J., 378
- Pil P. M., 1992, Science 256, 234−237.
- Lyubchenko Y. L., 2002, Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 4902−4909.
- Webb M., 2001, J. Mol. Biol., 309, 88
- Bianchi M. E., 1989, Science 243, 1056−1059.
- Fojta M., 2003, Recognition of DNA modified by antitumor cisplatin by “latent
- Imamura T., 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276
- Štros M., 2001, Biochemistry 40, 4769−4779.
- Cunningham R. P., 1981, Cell 24, 213−223.
- Bianchi M., 1983, Cell 34, 931−939.
- Kmiec E. B., 1986, Cell 44, 545−554.
- McKee B. D., 1992, Genetics 132, 529−544.
- Schwacha A., 1995, Cell 83, 783−791.
- Polanco C., 2000, Genetics 155, 1221−1229.
- Kajander O. A., 2001, EMBO Rep. 2, 1007−1012.
- Segurado M., 2002, Mol. Cells 10, 907−916.
- Sogo J. M., 1986, J. Mol. Biol., 189
- Lucas I., 2000, Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 2187−2193.
- Benard M., 2001, Mol. Cells 7, 971−980.
- Wellinger R. E., 2003, Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 6363−6372.
- Rubbi C. P., 2003, EMBO J., 22
- Wang L., 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276
- Scaffidi P., 2002, Nature 418, 191−195.
- Abbreviations HMG, high-mobility group
Cited by
High-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1): nuclear weapon in the immune arsenal
Lotze, M. T., & Tracey, K. J. (2005) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1594 · Cited by 2,487
Kang, R., Chen, R., Zhang, Q., Hou, W., Wu, S., Cao, L., Huang, J., Yu, Y., Fan, X.-G., Yan, Z., et al. (2014) · Molecular Aspects of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.mam.2014.05.001 · Cited by 956
Senescent cells as a source of inflammatory factors for tumor progression
Davalos, A. R., Coppe, J.-P., Campisi, J., & Desprez, P.-Y. (2010) · Cancer and Metastasis Reviews · doi:10.1007/s10555-010-9220-9 · Cited by 636
HMGB proteins: Interactions with DNA and chromatin
Štros, M. (2010) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms · doi:10.1016/j.bbagrm.2009.09.008 · Cited by 611
Self-citationTranscriptional Regulation by P53
Beckerman, R., & Prives, C. (2010) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a000935 · Cited by 569
Metadata
- Authors
- Štros, M., Muselíková-Polanská, E., Pospíšilová, Š., & Strauss, F.
- Affiliations
- Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics (CZ)
- Corresponding author
- Štros, Michal
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-05-13
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 7215-7225
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2085442496
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 2.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Diffusion and Search Dynamics
- Keywords
- p53, HMGB1, DNA loops, alternative DNA structures, protein-DNA binding affinity, chromatin structure, tumor suppressor proteins
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Binding Sites, Cattle, Glutathione Transferase, Humans, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Protein Binding, Substrate Specificity, Thymus Gland, Transcriptional Activation, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay, HMGB1 Protein, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, DNA, Catenated, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-Affinity Binding of Tumor-Suppressor Protein p53 and HMGB1 to Hemicatenated DNA Loops. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi049928k
- The paper
- Štros, M., Muselíková-Polanská, E., Pospíšilová, Š., & Strauss, F. (2004). High-Affinity Binding of Tumor-Suppressor Protein p53 and HMGB1 to Hemicatenated DNA Loops. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi049928k
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.