The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiple Interactions between Polyphenols and a Salivary Proline-Rich Protein Repeat Result in Complexation and Precipitation
Abstract
Polyphenols (tannins) in the diet not only precipitate oral proteins, producing an astringent sensation, but also interact with dietary proteins and digestive enzymes in the gut, resulting in a variety of antinutritive and toxic effects. Salivary proline-rich proteins (PRPs), which are secreted into the oral cavity, form complexes with and precipitate dietary polyphenols, and thus, they constitute the primary mammalian defense directed against ingested tannins. In order to characterize the interaction, NMR studies were performed which involved titrating a series of polyphenols into a synthetic 19-residue PRP fragment. The results show that the predominant mode of association is a hydrophobic stacking of the polyphenol ring against the pro-S face of proline and that the first proline residue of a Pro-Pro sequence is a particularly favored binding site. Measurement of dissociation constants indicates that the larger and more complex polyphenols interact more strongly with the PRP fragment; the order of binding affinity was determined as procyanidin dimer B-2 > pentagalloylglucose > trigalloylglucose >> proanthocyanidin monomer (-)-epicatechin approximately propyl gallate. Smaller polyphenols can bind with one phenolic ring stacked against each proline residue, whereas larger polyphenols occupy two or three consecutive prolines. The more complex polyphenols interact with the PRP fragment in a multidentate fashion; moreover, they self-associate or stack when bound. Thus, a model is proposed in which multiple polyphenol/polyphenol and polyphenol/PRP interactions act cooperatively to achieve precipitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Influence of proline residues on protein conformation
MacArthur, M. W., & Thornton, J. M. (1991) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(91)90721-h · Cited by 1,189
Cited by
Interactions between Polyphenols and Macromolecules: Quantification Methods and Mechanisms
Le Bourvellec, C., & Renard, C. M. G. C. (2012) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2010.499808 · Cited by 853
Packer, L., Rimbach, G., & Virgili, F. (1999) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0891-5849(99)00090-8 · Cited by 660
Molecular Model for Astringency Produced by Polyphenol/Protein Interactions
Jöbstl, E., O'Connell, J., Fairclough, J. P. A., & Williamson, M. P. (2004) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm0345110 · Cited by 365
Self-citationCinnamon extract inhibits tau aggregation associated with Alzheimer’s disease in vitro
Peterson, D. W., George, R. C., Scaramozzino, F., LaPointe, N. E., Anderson, R. A., Graves, D. J., & Lew, J. (2009) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-2009-1083 · Cited by 171
Metadata
- Authors
- Baxter, N. J., Lilley, T. H., Haslam, E., & Williamson, M. P.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1997-05-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 5566-5577
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2139852945
- Cited by
- 682
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.