Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 272

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Endosomal Escape of Polymeric Gene Delivery Complexes Is Not Always Enhanced by Polymers Buffering at Low pH

Funhoff, Arjen M., van Nostrum, Cornelus F., Koning, Gerben A., Schuurmans-Nieuwenbroek, Nancy M. E., Crommelin, Daan J. A., Hennink, Wim E.·2004·Biomacromolecules

Abstract

One of the crucial steps in gene delivery with cationic polymers is the escape of the polymer/DNA complexes ("polyplexes") from the endosome. A possible way to enhance endosomal escape is the use of cationic polymers with a pKa around or slightly below physiological pH ("proton sponge"). We synthesized a new polymer with two tertiary amine groups in each monomeric unit [poly(2-methyl-acrylic acid 2-[(2-(dimethylamino)-ethyl)-methyl-amino]-ethyl ester), abbreviated as pDAMA]. One pKa of the monomer is approximately 9, providing cationic charge at physiological pH, and thus DNA binding properties, the other is approximately 5 and provides endosomal buffering capacity. Using dynamic light scattering and zeta potential measurements, it was shown that pDAMA is able to condense DNA in small particles with a surface charge depending on the polymer/DNA ratio. pDAMA has a substantial lower toxicity than other polymeric transfectants, but in vitro, the transfection activity of the pDAMA-based polyplexes was very low. The addition of a membrane disruptive peptide to pDAMA-based polyplexes considerably increased the transfection efficiency without adversely affecting the cytotoxicity of the system. This indicates that the pDAMA-based polyplexes alone are not able to mediate escape from the endosomes via the proton sponge mechanism. Our observations imply that the proton sponge hypothesis is not generally applicable for polymers with buffering capacity at low pH and gives rise to a reconsideration of this hypothesis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bm034041+

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 272

Metadata

Authors
Funhoff, A. M., van Nostrum, C. F., Koning, G. A., Schuurmans-Nieuwenbroek, N. M. E., Crommelin, D. J. A., & Hennink, W. E.
Venue
Biomacromolecules
Published
2003-11-21
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
32-39
ISSN
  • 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4602
OpenAlex
W2040683552
Cited by
272
References
1
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endosomal Escape of Polymeric Gene Delivery Complexes Is Not Always Enhanced by Polymers Buffering at Low pH. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bm034041+
The paper
Funhoff, A. M., van Nostrum, C. F., Koning, G. A., Schuurmans-Nieuwenbroek, N. M. E., Crommelin, D. J. A., & Hennink, W. E. (2004). Endosomal Escape of Polymeric Gene Delivery Complexes Is Not Always Enhanced by Polymers Buffering at Low pH. Biomacromolecules. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm034041%2B

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.