The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determination of the Number-Average Degree of Polymerization of Cellodextrins and Cellulose with Application to Enzymatic Hydrolysis
Abstract
A rapid and accurate method for determining the number-average degree of polymerization (DP(n)) was established for insoluble cellulose and soluble cellodextrins as the ratio of glucosyl monomer concentration determined by the phenol-sulfuric acid method divided by the reducing-end concentration determined by a modified 2,2'-bicinchoninate (BCA) method. The modified BCA method, featuring incubation at 75 degrees C for 30 min, did not result in beta-glucosidic bond cleavage, whereas substantial cleavage was observed at higher temperature. Solubilization of insoluble cellulose in cold phosphoric acid prior to measurement of the reducing-end concentration by the BCA method was found not to be necessary for several model celluloses such as microcrystalline cellulose, but such solubilization was required for large fibers of cellulose such as Whatman No. 1 filter paper. The phenol-sulfuric acid method can be used for measuring the glucosyl monomer concentration of soluble cellodextrins, and also for insoluble cellulose if preceded by a liquefaction step. Standard deviations of < or =2% were obtained for both reducing and glucosyl monomer determination and of < or =3% for overall determination of DP. By use of the reported method, hydrolysis of phosphoric acid-swollen cellulose (PASC) by the Trichoderma reesei cellulase system was shown to result in a rapid decrease in DP as hydrolysis proceeded. By contrast, the DP of Avicel remained nearly constant during hydrolysis. The specific enzymatic cellulose hydrolysis rate is 100-fold higher for PASC as compared to Avicel.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Colorimetric Method for Determination of Sugars and Related Substances
DuBois, M., Gilles, K. A., Hamilton, J. K., Rebers, P. A., & Smith, F. (1956) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac60111a017 · Cited by 52,269
Use of Dinitrosalicylic Acid Reagent for Determination of Reducing Sugar
Miller, G. L. (1959) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac60147a030 · Cited by 28,963
Measurement of cellulase activities
Ghose, T. K. (1987) · Pure and Applied Chemistry · doi:10.1351/pac198759020257 · Cited by 6,174
Somogyi, M. (1952) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)50870-5 · Cited by 5,284
Dissolution of Cellose with Ionic Liquids
Swatloski, R. P., Spear, S. K., Holbrey, J. D., & Rogers, R. D. (2002) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja025790m · Cited by 4,728
Microbial Cellulose Utilization: Fundamentals and Biotechnology
Lynd, L. R., Weimer, P. J., van Zyl, W. H., & Pretorius, I. S. (2002) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.66.3.506-577.2002 · Cited by 4,726
Self-citationWood: Chemistry, ultrastructure, reactions
(1983) · doi:10.1515/9783110839654 · Cited by 2,846
Zhang, Y. P., & Lynd, L. R. (2004) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.20282 · Cited by 1,893
Self-citationMethods for measuring cellulase activities
Wood, T. M., & Bhat, K. M. (1988) · Methods in Enzymology · doi:10.1016/0076-6879(88)60109-1 · Cited by 1,349
Homogeneous Acetylation of Cellulose in a New Ionic Liquid
Wu, J., Zhang, J., Zhang, H., He, J., Ren, Q., & Guo, M. (2004) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm034398d · Cited by 646
Cited by
Payne, C. M., Knott, B. C., Mayes, H. B., Hansson, H., Himmel, M. E., Sandgren, M., Ståhlberg, J., & Beckham, G. T. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500351c · Cited by 855
Reviving the carbohydrate economy via multi-product lignocellulose biorefineries
Zhang, Y.-H. P. (2008) · Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s10295-007-0293-6 · Cited by 622
Self-citationFractionating recalcitrant lignocellulose at modest reaction conditions
Zhang, Y. P., Ding, S., Mielenz, J. R., Cui, J., Elander, R. T., Laser, M., Himmel, M. E., McMillan, J. R., & Lynd, L. R. (2007) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.21386 · Cited by 589
Self-citationEnhancement of cellulose saccharification kinetics using an ionic liquid pretreatment step
Dadi, A. P., Varanasi, S., & Schall, C. A. (2006) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.21047 · Cited by 574
Single-step conversion of cellulose to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF), a versatile platform chemical
Su, Y., Brown, H. M., Huang, X., Zhou, X.-D., Amonette, J. E., & Zhang, Z. C. (2009) · Applied Catalysis A: General · doi:10.1016/j.apcata.2009.04.002 · Cited by 436
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Y.-H. P., & Lynd, L. R.
- Venue
- Biomacromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-03-18
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1510-1515
- ISSN
- 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4602
- OpenAlex
- W2009849247
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 5.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of the Number-Average Degree of Polymerization of Cellodextrins and Cellulose with Application to Enzymatic Hydrolysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bm049235j
- The paper
- Zhang, Y.-H. P., & Lynd, L. R. (2005). Determination of the Number-Average Degree of Polymerization of Cellodextrins and Cellulose with Application to Enzymatic Hydrolysis. Biomacromolecules. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm049235j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.