The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Network Formation and Degradation Behavior of Hydrogels Formed by Michael-Type Addition Reactions
Abstract
Hydrolytically labile poly(ethylene glycol)-based hydrogels are fabricated via a Michael-type addition reaction between unsaturated acrylate moieties and nucleophilic thiols. Although these gels offer the advantage of selective, in situ polymerization and potential as biocompatible matrixes for cell and protein encapsulation, a thorough understanding of the complex structure-property relationships that control the macroscopic behaviors of these cross-linked networks before and during hydrolytic degradation does not exist. Therefore, in this work, a novel theoretical model is presented to describe the formation and hydrolytic degradation of the step-polymerized gels. The model accounts for variations in hydrolysis kinetics as well as structural effects such as precursor functionality and the presence of primary cycles or other structural nonidealities that lower the cross-linking efficiency of the networks. Comparison of model predictions and experimental data validate this methodology for optimizing biomaterial design and reveal that structural nonidealities play a key role in determining the degradation behavior of real cross-linked systems. Decreasing precursor concentration and functionality during network formation generate high concentrations of network nonidealities that ultimately lead to higher initial swelling ratios and faster apparent rates of degradation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications
Drury, J. L., & Mooney, D. J. (2003) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00340-5 · Cited by 5,136
Photopolymerizable hydrogels for tissue engineering applications
Nguyen, K. T., & West, J. L. (2002) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00175-8 · Cited by 1,669
Repair of bone defects using synthetic mimetics of collagenous extracellular matrices
Lutolf, M. P., Weber, F. E., Schmoekel, H. G., Schense, J. C., Kohler, T., Müller, R., & Hubbell, J. A. (2003) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt818 · Cited by 850
Self-citationBryant, S. J., & Anseth, K. S. (2002) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research · doi:10.1002/jbm.1217 · Cited by 845
Elliott, J. E., Macdonald, M., Nie, J., & Bowman, C. N. (2004) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2003.12.040 · Cited by 463
Cited by
Hydrogels in controlled release formulations: Network design and mathematical modeling
Lin, C.-C., & Metters, A. T. (2006) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2006.09.004 · Cited by 1,768
Self-citationPhotodegradable Hydrogels for Dynamic Tuning of Physical and Chemical Properties
Kloxin, A. M., Kasko, A. M., Salinas, C. N., & Anseth, K. S. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1169494 · Cited by 1,748
Bioactive modification of poly (ethylene glycol) hydrogels for tissue engineering
Zhu, J. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.02.044 · Cited by 1,457
Hydrogels in a historical perspective: From simple networks to smart materials
Buwalda, S. J., Boere, K. W. M., Dijkstra, P. J., Feijen, J., Vermonden, T., & Hennink, W. E. (2014) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.03.052 · Cited by 994
Designing degradable hydrogels for orthogonal control of cell microenvironments
Kharkar, P. M., Kiick, K. L., & Kloxin, A. M. (2013) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c3cs60040h · Cited by 717
Metadata
- Authors
- Metters, A., & Hubbell, J.
- Venue
- Biomacromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-11-13
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 290-301
- ISSN
- 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4602
- OpenAlex
- W2070170630
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 3.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.