Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 355

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Characterization of Cellulose Whiskers and Their Nanocomposites by Atomic Force and Electron Microscopy

Kvien, Ingvild, Tanem, Bjørn S., Oksman, Kristiina·2005·Biomacromolecules
DOI 10.1021/bm050479t
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The aim of this work was to compare and explore electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy (AFM) for structure determination of cellulose whiskers and their nanocomposite with poly(lactic acid). From conventional bright-field transmission electron microscopy (TEM) it was possible to identify individual whiskers, which enabled determination of their sizes and shape. AFM overestimated the width of the whiskers due to the tip-broadening effect. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) allowed for a quick examination giving an overview of the sample; however, the resolution was considered insufficient for detailed information. Ultramicrotomy of nanocomposite films at cryogenic temperatures enabled detailed inspection of the cellulose whiskers in the poly(lactic acid) matrix by AFM. FESEM applied on fractured surfaces allowed insight into the morphology of the nanocomposite, although rather restricted due to the metal coating and limited resolution. Detailed information was obtained from TEM; however, this technique required staining and suffered in general from limited contrast and beam sensitivity of the material.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bm050479t

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Azizi Samir M. A. S., 2005, Biomacromolecules, 6, 612, 10.1021/bm0493685 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Azizi Samir M. A. S., 2004, Macromolecules, 37, 4313, 10.1021/ma035939u · DOI · Paper page
  3. Ruiz M. M., 2001, Macromol. Symp.
  4. Schroers M., 2004, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 93, 2883, 10.1002/app.20870 · DOI
  5. Azizi Samir M. A. S., 2004, Macromolecules, 37, 1386, 10.1021/ma030532a · DOI · Paper page
  6. Azizi Samir M. A. S., 2004, Polymer, 45, 4149, 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.03.094 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Chazeau L., 1999, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 71, 1797, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990314)71:11<1797::AID-APP9>3.0.CO;2-E · DOI · Paper page
  8. Tashiro K., 1991, Polymer, 32, 1516, 10.1016/0032-3861(91)90435-L · DOI · Paper page
  9. Revol J.-F., 1992, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 14, 170, 10.1016/S0141-8130(05)80008-X · DOI · Paper page
  10. Rånby B. G., 1952, Tappi, 35, 53
  11. Sassi J.-F., 1995, Cellulose, 2, 111, 10.1007/BF00816384 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Marchessault R. H., 1961, J. Colloid Sci., 16, 327, 10.1016/0095-8522(61)90033-2 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Marchessault R. H., 1959, Nature, 184, 632, 10.1038/184632a0 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Mukherjee S. M., 1953, J. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 10, 499, 10.1016/0006-3002(53)90295-9 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Dong X. M., 1996, Langmuir, 12, 2076, 10.1021/la950133b · DOI · Paper page
  16. Nair K. G., 2003, Biomacromolecules, 4, 657, 10.1021/bm020127b · DOI · Paper page
  17. Nair K. G., 2003, Biomacromolecules, 4, 1835, 10.1021/bm030058g · DOI · Paper page
  18. Revol J.-F., 1993, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 15, 329, 10.1016/0141-8130(93)90049-R · DOI · Paper page
  19. Paillet M., 2001, Macromolecules, 34, 6527, 10.1021/ma002049v · DOI · Paper page
  20. Angellier H., 2005, Macromolecules, 38, 3783, 10.1021/ma050054z · DOI · Paper page
  21. Angellier H., 2005, Macromol. Symp.
  22. Lu Y., 2004, Biomacromolecules, 5, 1046, 10.1021/bm034516x · DOI · Paper page
  23. Kuutti L., 1995, J. Microsc., 178, 1, 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1995.tb03573.x · DOI
  24. Baker A. A., 1997, J. Struct. Biol., 119, 129, 10.1006/jsbi.1997.3866 · DOI
  25. Baker A. A., 1998, J. Appl. Phys. A, 66, S559, 10.1007/s003399870002 · DOI
  26. Baker A. A., 2000, Biophys. J., 79, 1139, 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76367-3 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Weisenhorn A. L., 1989, Appl. Phys. Lett., 54, 2651, 10.1063/1.101024 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Mathew A. P., 2005, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 97, 2014, 10.1002/app.21779 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Markiewiez P., 1995, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B, 13, 1115, 10.1116/1.587913 · doi:10.1116/1.587913

Cited by

See all 355

Metadata

Authors
Kvien, I., Tanem, B. S., & Oksman, K.
Venue
Biomacromolecules
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2005-10-08
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
3160-3165
ISSN
  • 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4602
DOI
10.1021/bm050479t
OpenAlex
W1971974459
Cited by
355
References
10
FWCI
5.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.