Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 304

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Microfabrication of Hepatocyte/Fibroblast Co-cultures: Role of Homotypic Cell Interactions

Bhatia, S.N., Balis, U.J., Yarmush, M.L., Toner, M.·1998·Biotechnology Progress

Abstract

Cell-cell interactions are important in embryogenesis, in adult physiology and pathophysiology of many disease processes. Co-cultivation of parenchymal and mesenchymal cells has been widely utilized as a paradigm for the study of cell-cell interactions in vitro. In addition, co-cultures of two cell types provide highly functional tissue constructs for use in therapeutic or investigational applications. The inherent complexity of such co-cultures creates difficulty in characterization of cell-cell interactions and their effects on function. In the present study, we utilize conventional "randomly distributed" co-cultures of primary rat hepatocytes and murine 3T3-J2 fibroblasts to investigate the role of increasing fibroblast density on hepatic function. In addition, we utilize microfabrication techniques to localize both cell populations in patterned configurations on rigid substrates. This technique allowed the isolation of fibroblast number as an independent variable in hepatic function. Notably, homotypic hepatocyte interactions were held constant by utilization of similar hepatocyte patterns in all conditions, and the heterotypic interface (region of contact between cell populations) was also held constant. Co-cultures were probed for synthetic and metabolic markers of liver-specific function. The data suggest that fibroblast number plays a role in modulation of hepatocellular response through homotypic fibroblast interactions. The response to changes in fibroblast number are distinct from those attributed to increased contact between hepatocytes and fibroblasts. This approach will allow further elucidation of the complex interplay between two cell types as they form a functional model tissue in vitro or as they interact in vivo to form a functional organ.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bp980036j

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 304

Metadata

Authors
Bhatia, S. N., Balis, U. J., Yarmush, M. L., & Toner, M.
Venue
Biotechnology Progress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-06-05
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
378-387
ISSN
  • 1520-6033 (ISSN-L)
  • 8756-7938
OpenAlex
W2070190764
Cited by
304
References
1
FWCI
5.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microfabrication of Hepatocyte/Fibroblast Co-cultures: Role of Homotypic Cell Interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bp980036j
The paper
Bhatia, S. N., Balis, U. J., Yarmush, M. L., & Toner, M. (1998). Microfabrication of Hepatocyte/Fibroblast Co-cultures: Role of Homotypic Cell Interactions. Biotechnology Progress. https://doi.org/10.1021/bp980036j

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.