The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Generation of a Unique Machine Description for Chemical Structures-A Technique Developed at Chemical Abstracts Service.
Abstract
ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVArticleNEXTThe Generation of a Unique Machine Description for Chemical Structures-A Technique Developed at Chemical Abstracts Service.H. L. MorganCite this: J. Chem. Doc. 1965, 5, 2, 107–113Publication Date (Print):May 1, 1965Publication History Published online1 May 2002Published inissue 1 May 1965https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/c160017a018https://doi.org/10.1021/c160017a018research-articleACS PublicationsRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views4987Altmetric-Citations930LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access options Get e-Alerts
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Geometric Deep Learning: Going beyond Euclidean data
Bronstein, M. M., Bruna, J., LeCun, Y., Szlam, A., & Vandergheynst, P. (2017) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2017.2693418 · Cited by 3,661
The rise of deep learning in drug discovery
Chen, H., Engkvist, O., Wang, Y., Olivecrona, M., & Blaschke, T. (2018) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2018.01.039 · Cited by 1,770
Molecular Sets (MOSES): A Benchmarking Platform for Molecular Generation Models
Polykovskiy, D., Zhebrak, A., Sanchez-Lengeling, B., Golovanov, S., Tatanov, O., Belyaev, S., Kurbanov, R., Artamonov, A., Aladinskiy, V., Veselov, M., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2020.565644 · Cited by 849
Self-Driving Laboratories for Chemistry and Materials Science
Tom, G., Schmid, S. P., Baird, S. G., Cao, Y., Darvish, K., Hao, H., Lo, S., Pablo-García, S., Rajaonson, E. M., Skreta, M., et al. (2024) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00055 · Cited by 707
Systematic integration of biomedical knowledge prioritizes drugs for repurposing
Himmelstein, D. S., Lizee, A., Hessler, C., Brueggeman, L., Chen, S. L., Hadley, D., Green, A., Khankhanian, P., & Baranzini, S. E. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.26726 · Cited by 666
Molecular representations in AI-driven drug discovery: a review and practical guide
David, L., Thakkar, A., Mercado, R., & Engkvist, O. (2020) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-020-00460-5 · Cited by 587
REINVENT 2.0: An AI Tool for De Novo Drug Design
Blaschke, T., Arús-Pous, J., Chen, H., Margreitter, C., Tyrchan, C., Engkvist, O., Papadopoulos, K., & Patronov, A. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00915 · Cited by 496
Gentile, F., Yaacoub, J. C., Gleave, J., Fernandez, M., Ton, A.-T., Ban, F., Stern, A., & Cherkasov, A. (2022) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-021-00659-2 · Cited by 397
Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Predicting Drug-Target Interactions
Torng, W., & Altman, R. B. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00628 · Cited by 371
Information retrieval and text mining technologies for chemistry
Krallinger, M., Rabal, O., Lourenço, A., Oyarzabal, J., & Valencia, A. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00851 · Cited by 281
Entangled Conditional Adversarial Autoencoder for de Novo Drug Discovery
Polykovskiy, D., Zhebrak, A., Vetrov, D., Ivanenkov, Y., Aladinskiy, V., Mamoshina, P., Bozdaganyan, M., Aliper, A., Zhavoronkov, A., & Kadurin, A. (2018) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.8b00839 · Cited by 278
Metrics for measuring distances in configuration spaces
Sadeghi, A., Ghasemi, S. A., Schaefer, B., Mohr, S., Lill, M. A., & Goedecker, S. (2013) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4828704 · Cited by 141
Myint, K.-Z., Wang, L., Tong, Q., & Xie, X.-Q. (2012) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/mp300237z · Cited by 139
Machine learning modeling of family wide enzyme-substrate specificity screens
Goldman, S., Das, R., Yang, K. K., & Coley, C. W. (2022) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009853 · Cited by 120
Comparative Study of Multitask Toxicity Modeling on a Broad Chemical Space
Sosnin, S., Karlov, D., Tetko, I. V., & Fedorov, M. V. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00685 · Cited by 102
“OEstate descriptors which are based on electrostatic properties of atoms and bonds CDK2 (3D) 43 Chemistry development kit descriptors, version 2.0 Morgan fingerprints 38,39 Morgan (circular) fingerprints of radius two (which corresponds to ECFP4 38 ) calculated by RDKit.”
MethodInfluentialNelson, C. A., Butte, A. J., & Baranzini, S. E. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11069-0 · Cited by 85
Perceiver CPI: a nested cross-attention network for compound–protein interaction prediction
Nguyen, N.-Q., Jang, G., Kim, H., & Kang, J. (2023) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btac731 · Cited by 83
Dawson, D. E., Lau, C., Pradeep, P., Sayre, R. R., Judson, R. S., Tornero-Velez, R., & Wambaugh, J. F. (2023) · Toxics · doi:10.3390/toxics11020098 · Cited by 56
Efficient Heuristics for Maximum Common Substructure Search
Englert, P., & Kovács, P. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00036 · Cited by 36
DeepCOP: deep learning-based approach to predict gene regulating effects of small molecules
Woo, G., Fernandez, M., Hsing, M., Lack, N. A., Cavga, A. D., & Cherkasov, A. (2020) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz645 · Cited by 32
Minisini, M., Di Giorgio, E., Kerschbamer, E., Dalla, E., Faggiani, M., Franforte, E., Meyer-Almes, F.-J., Ragno, R., Antonini, L., Mai, A., et al. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkac081 · Cited by 28
Myint, K. Z., & Xie, X.-Q. (2015) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2239-0_9 · Cited by 21
(2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 11
Unleashing the potential of cell painting assays for compound activities and hazards prediction
Odje, F., Meijer, D., von Coburg, E., van der Hooft, J. J. J., Dunst, S., Medema, M. H., & Volkamer, A. (2024) · Frontiers in Toxicology · doi:10.3389/ftox.2024.1401036 · Cited by 11
DrugForm-DTA: Towards real-world drug-target binding affinity model
Khokhlov, I., Tashchilova, A., Bugaev-Makarovskiy, N., Glushkova, O., Yudin, V., Keskinov, A., Yudin, S., Svetlichnyy, D., & Skvortsova, V. (2025) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2025.09.023 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Morgan, H. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Documentation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1965-05-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 107-113
- ISSN
- 0021-9576 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-5732
- OpenAlex
- W2044834685
- Cited by
- 1,692
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
