Cited by 63Microbial Natural Products and BiosynthesisMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsChemical Synthesis and Analysis

Nucleophilic 1,4-Additions for Natural Product Discovery

Open access
Cox, Courtney L., Tietz, Jonathan I., Sokolowski, Karol, Melby, Joel O., Doroghazi, James R., Mitchell, Douglas A.·2014·ACS Chemical Biology

Abstract

Natural products remain an important source of drug candidates, but the difficulties inherent to traditional isolation, coupled with unacceptably high rates of compound rediscovery, limit the pace of natural product detection. Here we describe a reactivity-based screening method to rapidly identify exported bacterial metabolites that contain dehydrated amino acids (i.e., carbonyl- or imine-activated alkenes), a common motif in several classes of natural products. Our strategy entails the use of a commercially available thiol, dithiothreitol, for the covalent labeling of activated alkenes by nucleophilic 1,4-addition. Modification is easily discerned by comparing mass spectra of reacted and unreacted cell surface extracts. When combined with bioinformatic analysis of putative natural product gene clusters, targeted screening and isolation can be performed on a prioritized list of strains. Moreover, known compounds are easily dereplicated, effectively eliminating superfluous isolation and characterization. As a proof of principle, this labeling method was used to identify known natural products belonging to the thiopeptide, lanthipeptide, and linaridin classes. Further, upon screening a panel of only 23 actinomycetes, we discovered and characterized a novel thiopeptide antibiotic, cyclothiazomycin C.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cb500324n

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Numerous thiol containing chemical probes have been utilized to detect these functional groups in a targeted fashion.

    “Over the years, mimicking this unique reactivity has turned into a strategy to detect these functional groups in a targeted fashion, for this purpose numerous thiol containing chemical probes (e.g., glutathione, mercaptoethanol, 4-chlorothiophenol),122–124 have been utilized.”

    From Connecting metabolome and phenotype: recent advances in functional metabolomics tools for the identification of bioactive natural products (2024) · cites this paper as [124]

    The Results and Discussion (‘Rationale and overview of a new natural product discovery method’; page not provided) describe using the thiol probe dithiothreitol to detect dehydrated amino acid–containing natural products. The paper supports the targeted-detection strategy, but it does not establish the use of numerous probes or the listed examples—glutathione, mercaptoethanol, and 4-chlorothiophenol. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The practice of labeling functional groups in uncharacterized NP mixtures using a non-targeted metabolomics approach is uncommon in NP discovery, and there are currently only a few existing examples.

    “Although these approaches have been in certain cases efficiently applied for NP discovery, the practice of labeling functional groups in uncharacterized NP mixtures using a non-targeted metabolomics approach is uncommon in NP discovery, and there are currently only a few existing examples.124–128”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [32]Velasquez JE van der Donk WA Genome mining for ribosomally synthesized natural products Curr Opin Chem Biol 2011 15 11 21 21095156 PMC3090663

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cox, C. L., Tietz, J. I., Sokolowski, K., Melby, J. O., Doroghazi, J. R., & Mitchell, D. A.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Mitchell, Douglas A.
Venue
ACS Chemical Biology
Published
2014-06-17
Volume
9
Issue
9
Pages
2014-2022
ISSN
  • 1554-8929 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-8937
OpenAlex
W1978333914
Cited by
63
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Chemical Biology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1dp2od008463-01)
  • National Center for Research Resources (S10 RR027109 A, S10RR027109)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
natural product discovery, activated alkenes, dereplication, thiopeptides, lanthipeptides, actinomycetes, covalent labeling
MeSH terms
Amino Acids, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bacteriocins, Biological Products, Dithiothreitol, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Ethylamines, Multigene Family, Peptides, Cyclic, Mass Spectrometry, Thiazoles, Thiostrepton, Reproducibility of Results, Molecular Structure, Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization, Computational Biology, Actinobacteria, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review