Cited by 116Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and ApplicationsCovalent Organic Framework ApplicationsMachine Learning in Materials Science

Construction and Characterization of Structure Models of Crystalline Porous Polymers

Martin, Richard Luis, Haranczyk, Maciej·2014·Crystal Growth & Design

Abstract

Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) and covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are examples of advanced porous polymeric materials that have emerged in recent years. Their crystalline structure and modular synthesis offer unmatched versatility in their design. By exchanging chemical building blocks, one can both explore the unlimited space of possible structural chemistry within an isoreticular (same crystal topology) series and achieve a wide range of alternative topologies. This reticular paradigm potentially enables the design of structures with any desired porosity and internal surface chemistry. Reliable structure models are typically required in order to predict material properties using a broad spectrum of molecular modeling techniques. In this work, we introduce an algorithm for the assembly of crystalline porous polymer structure models which permits precise control over the underlying topologies of the generated models. This tool has been applied to high-throughput combinatorial structure enumeration and optimization-based automated design. Here, we demonstrate applications of this tool in crystal structure modeling tasks for both MOFs and COFs. Our algorithm is made available within our open source Zeo++ software suite.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cg500158c

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combinatorial enumeration with small changes in linker chemistry and metal SBUs can result in large data sets of 100k or more MOFs, although how well such sets represent the diversity of synthetically accessible materials has been questioned.

    “Combinatorial enumeration with small changes in linker chemistry (e.g., functional groups) and metal SBUs can result in large data sets of 100k or more MOFs (27,28,38,39), although how well such sets represent the diversity of synthetically accessible materials has been questioned (40)”
  • Demonstrations have included the screening of the more than 13k MOFs in the ToBaCCo set for hydrogen storage or other similarly large MOF sets for methane storage.

    “Demonstrations have included the screening of the more than 13k MOFs in the ToBaCCo set (28) for hydrogen storage (47) or other similarly large MOF sets for methane storage (39, 48).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martin, R. L., & Haranczyk, M.
Affiliations
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • Computational Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, One Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720-8139, United States
Venue
Crystal Growth & Design
Published
2014-04-02
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
2431-2440
ISSN
  • 1528-7483 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-7505
OpenAlex
W2335274251
Cited by
116
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Crystal Growth & Design (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Covalent Organic Framework Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
Keywords
metal-organic frameworks, covalent organic frameworks, crystal topology, crystal structure modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review