Cited by 37Computational Drug Discovery MethodsReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases

Application of Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship Models of 5-HT1A Receptor Binding to Virtual Screening Identifies Novel and Potent 5-HT1A Ligands

Open access
Luo, Man, Wang, Xiang Simon, Roth, Bryan L., Golbraikh, Alexander, Tropsha, Alexander·2014·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Abstract

The 5-hydroxytryptamine 1A (5-HT1A) serotonin receptor has been an attractive target for treating mood and anxiety disorders such as schizophrenia. We have developed binary classification quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models of 5-HT1A receptor binding activity using data retrieved from the PDSP Ki database. The prediction accuracy of these models was estimated by external 5-fold cross-validation as well as using an additional validation set comprising 66 structurally distinct compounds from the World of Molecular Bioactivity database. These validated models were then used to mine three major types of chemical screening libraries, i.e., drug-like libraries, GPCR targeted libraries, and diversity libraries, to identify novel computational hits. The five best hits from each class of libraries were chosen for further experimental testing in radioligand binding assays, and nine of the 15 hits were confirmed to be active experimentally with binding affinity better than 10 μM. The most active compound, Lysergol, from the diversity library showed very high binding affinity (Ki) of 2.3 nM against 5-HT1A receptor. The novel 5-HT1A actives identified with the QSAR-based virtual screening approach could be potentially developed as novel anxiolytics or potential antischizophrenic drugs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ci400460q

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using data on affinity of drug-like compounds against several GPCRs, the kNN method gave the best results, PASS moderate, SEA lowest.

    “The best results were obtained with the kNN method, while PASS demonstrated a moderate predictive accuracy and SEA shown the lowest prediction power across multiple targets.”

    From QSAR without borders (2020) · cites this paper as [113]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fine S.; Scheinberg K.; Effcient S. V. M. Training Using Low-rank Kernel Representations. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2001, 2, 243– 264.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luo, M., Wang, X. S., Roth, B. L., Golbraikh, A., & Tropsha, A.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Howard University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Xiang Simon
  • Tropsha, Alexander
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2014-02-12
Volume
54
Issue
2
Pages
634-647
ISSN
  • 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-960X
OpenAlex
W1990836196
Cited by
37
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
National Institutes of Health (GM066940, GM096967, RO1MH61887)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Keywords
5-HT1A receptor, serotonin receptors, QSAR models, virtual screening, receptor binding affinity, binary classification, GPCR ligands, lysergol, anxiolytics, antipsychotic drugs, mood and anxiety disorders
MeSH terms
Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Ligands, Protein Binding, Antipsychotic Agents, User-Computer Interface, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1A

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review