Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 477

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

WO3−Fe2O3Photoanodes for Water Splitting: A Host Scaffold, Guest Absorber Approach

Open access
Sivula, Kevin, Formal, Florian Le, Grätzel, Michael·2009·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

Solar hydrogen production via watersplitting with hematite (Fe 2 O 3 ) has been limited by poor light absorption and a small hole diffusion length. These drawbacks can be overcome by using a high-surface-area host to support a thin layer of hematite—allowing photogenerated holes to be produced in high proximity to the semiconductor-liquid junction. Here we demonstrate the effectiveness of this concept using a nanostructured host scaffold (WO 3 ) prepared by atmospheric pressure CVD to support a thin layer of Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles deposited by a similar method. A 20% increase in the photocurrent was observed in host−guest electrodes as compared to control films with the same amount of hematite (equivalent to a 60 nm film) deposited without the host scaffold. The improvement is attributed to an increase in the absorbed photon conversion efficiency (APCE), especially for longer wavelengths where the photon penetration depth is large in hematite. For light with a wavelength of 565 nm, the APCE improves to 8.0%, as compared to 5.7% with the control films because of the host/guest architecture.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cm900565a

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 477

Metadata

Authors
Sivula, K., Formal, F. L., & Grätzel, M.
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2009-06-08
Volume
21
Issue
13
Pages
2862-2867
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W2000223594
Cited by
477
References
1
FWCI
15.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.