Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 983

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 121 of the 121 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Advances in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Catalytic Asymmetric Epoxidation

Xia, Q.-H., Ge, H.-Q., Ye, C.-P., Liu, Z.-M., Su, K.-X.·2005·Chemical Reviews
DOI 10.1021/cr0406458
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVArticleNEXTAdvances in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Catalytic Asymmetric EpoxidationQ.-H. Xia, H.-Q. Ge, C.-P. Ye, Z.-M. Liu, and K.-X. SuView Author Information Laboratory for Advanced Materials and New Catalysis, School of Chemistry and Materials Science, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China, Laboratory of Natural Gas Utilization and Applied Catalysis, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China, and Jingmen Technological College, Jingmen 448000, China Cite this: Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 5, 1603–1662Publication Date (Web):April 19, 2005Publication History Received30 June 2004Published online19 April 2005Published inissue 1 May 2005https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cr0406458https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0406458research-articleACS PublicationsCopyright © 2005 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views13194Altmetric-Citations884LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose SUBJECTS:Catalysts,Hydrocarbons,Ligands,Organic reactions,Stereoselectivity Get e-Alerts

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cr0406458

Cites

121 of 121 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 983

Metadata

Authors
Xia, Q.-H., Ge, H.-Q., Ye, C.-P., Liu, Z.-M., & Su, K.-X.
Venue
Chemical Reviews
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2005-04-19
Volume
105
Issue
5
Pages
1603-1662
ISSN
  • 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6890
DOI
10.1021/cr0406458
OpenAlex
W2044649112
Cited by
983
References
121
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.