Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 383

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fuel Cell Perfluorinated Sulfonic Acid Membrane Degradation Correlating Accelerated Stress Testing and Lifetime

Open access
Rodgers, Marianne P., Bonville, Leonard J., Kunz, H. Russell, Slattery, Darlene K., Fenton, James M.·2012·Chemical Reviews

Abstract

Cost, durability, performance, reliability, efficiency, and size are some of the requirements that must be met before proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells can be used more extensively. The steady, moderate loss of performance is usually a result of steady electrode degradation, due to carbon corrosion, platinum dissolution and deposition inside the membrane, platinum sintering, particle growth, and recrystallization, or membrane degradation including fluoride loss, splitting of the backbone, and losses of side chains, ultimately resulting in membrane defects. Fundamental understanding of fuel cell degradation mechanisms and generation of expertise to mitigate this degradation is accomplished by directed lifetime and degradation testing. It is not practical to evaluate membrane durability using normal fuel cell operating conditions because of the time and resources involved.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cr200424d

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Rodgers, M. P., Bonville, L. J., Kunz, H. R., Slattery, D. K., & Fenton, J. M.
Venue
Chemical Reviews
Published
2012-10-12
Volume
112
Issue
11
Pages
6075-6103
ISSN
  • 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6890
OpenAlex
W2331461362
Cited by
383
References
8
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.