Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,302

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of Natural Products on Developing New Anti-Cancer Agents

Cragg, Gordon M., Grothaus, Paul G., Newman, David J.·2009·Chemical Reviews

Abstract

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVReviewNEXTImpact of Natural Products on Developing New Anti-Cancer Agents†Gordon M. Cragg, Paul G. Grothaus, and David J. Newman*View Author Information Natural Products Branch, Developmental Therapeutics Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI−Frederick, Fairview Center, Suite 206, P.O. Box B, Frederick, Maryland 21702-1201* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]†This manuscript reflects the opinion of the authors, not necessarily those of the United States Government.Cite this: Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 7, 3012–3043Publication Date (Web):May 7, 2009Publication History Received16 January 2009Published online7 May 2009Published inissue 8 July 2009https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cr900019jhttps://doi.org/10.1021/cr900019jreview-articleACS PublicationsCopyright © This article not subject to U.S. Copyright. Published 2009 by the American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views24433Altmetric-Citations991LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose SUBJECTS:Assays,Inhibitors,Peptides and proteins,Pharmaceuticals,Polarization Get e-Alerts

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cr900019j

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 1,302

Metadata

Authors
Cragg, G. M., Grothaus, P. G., & Newman, D. J.
Venue
Chemical Reviews
Published
2009-05-07
Volume
109
Issue
7
Pages
3012-3043
ISSN
  • 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6890
OpenAlex
W2084951981
Cited by
1,302
References
12
FWCI
4.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.