Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,284

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cross-Reactive Chemical Sensor Arrays

Albert, Keith J., Lewis, Nathan S., Schauer, Caroline L., Sotzing, Gregory A., Stitzel, Shannon E., Vaid, Thomas P., Walt, David R.·2000·Chemical Reviews

Abstract

Conventional approaches to chemical sensors have \ntraditionally made use of a “lock-and-key” design, \nwherein a specific receptor is synthesized in order to \nstrongly and highly selectively bind the analyte of \ninterest.1-6 A related approach involves exploiting a \ngeneral physicochemical effect selectively toward a \nsingle analyte, such as the use of the ionic effect in \nthe construction of a pH electrode. In the first \napproach, selectivity is achieved through recognition \nof the analyte at the receptor site, and in the second, \nselectivity is achieved through the transduction \nprocess in which the method of detection dictates \nwhich species are sensed. Such approaches are appropriate \nwhen a specific target compound is to be \nidentified in the presence of controlled backgrounds \nand interferences. However, this type of approach \nrequires the synthesis of a separate, highly selective \nsensor for each analyte to be detected. In addition, \nthis type of approach is not particularly useful for \nanalyzing, classifying, or assigning human value \njudgments to the composition of complex vapor \nmixtures such as perfumes, beers, foods, mixtures of \nsolvents, etc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cr980102w

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 1,284

Metadata

Authors
Albert, K. J., Lewis, N. S., Schauer, C. L., Sotzing, G. A., Stitzel, S. E., Vaid, T. P., & Walt, D. R.
Venue
Chemical Reviews
Published
2000-06-24
Volume
100
Issue
7
Pages
2595-2626
ISSN
  • 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6890
OpenAlex
W2091089517
Cited by
1,284
References
2
FWCI
5.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.